Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SIR STUART SAMUEL, M.P.

INDEMNITY BILL. OPPOSED. |{ly Telegranh.—Press Association-Copyright (Rec. May 11, 5.5 p.m.) London, May 10. Radical Nationalist and Unionist members of the House of Commons threaten Jo oppose the-Sir Stuart Samuel Indemnity Bill. Lord Hugh Cecil has given notice to move that whiio agreeable to indemnity in respect of exaggerated penalties, Sir Stuart Samuel should pay a inoderato penalty. It was announced last month that the Government intended to introduce ft Bill of Indemnity to relieve Sir Stuart Samuel of his liability to fines amounting to ,£16,500 for illegally participating in divisions—at the rate of .£SOO per division. This, though strictly legal in accordance yith tlio letter of tho statute, would he, in practice, an "exaggeratio" penalty.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130512.2.27

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1747, 12 May 1913, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
120

SIR STUART SAMUEL, M.P. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1747, 12 May 1913, Page 5

SIR STUART SAMUEL, M.P. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1747, 12 May 1913, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert