THE MARCONI INQUIRY.
RIVAL WIRELESS COMPANIES. "SOME PLAT DENIALS. I , . By Telegraph—Pr«B3 Association—Copyright (Rec. April 22, 8.5 p.m.) London, April .21. At a sitting of the Parliamentary Select Committee appointed to .inquire into the nature of the Marconi wireless contract with the British Post Office, Mr. Rose, the Poulsen Company's solicitor, flatly denied Mr. Godfroy Isaac's suggestions that Poulsen's had engineered a press campaign against the Marconi system, and Cabinet Ministers.
Mr. Rose denied every statement by Mr. Godfrey Isaacs regarding the alleged press' 9ampaign by Poulsens. He a'dded that Major Archer She© (Unionist M.P. for Finsbury Central), whom it was alleged was associated with tho Poulsen Syndicate in endeavouring to prevent ratification of tho contract between tho Post Office and the Marconi Company, had refused any financial interest in the company. He was merely told tho facts regarding the Poulsen system.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130423.2.53
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1731, 23 April 1913, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
142THE MARCONI INQUIRY. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1731, 23 April 1913, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in