Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REGRETTABLE.

DEVELOPMENT IN CRICKET,

Some astonishment lias been expressed this week at the .announcement that the Central senior teain will not fulfil theit engagement "to-day- in the dtawirigs for the senior flxtnresi ' l'rom tliß mere point of view of grade honours .this iiieaiis that Petone will win on a forfeit froifl tine of tho strongest, if not the strongest, team iit the senior competition. It is understand, further, that the Central Club propose) to withdraw; from senior' cricket as it; .is noV arranged. . . The reasons advanced lire several, bub principal nmtihg them .seehis to bo that tfejr are displeased with' the action of the control in sending them for two successive matches to Hiitt and then ti> Petons. With Sqhie show of reason they argue that, when nien have already beguii to look dilt their-football gisar, only the leading teams Jhould bo_ matched.

, In Soine'past yerirs it sefctns to have beeft • tho practice to pick olit the foilf leading teams and oppose them for this fitinl matches of the seaionj nnd it would have been much more.interesting for Central, for iiistahcp. to/meet East A and North instead of Huttand ketone. Another i'onson for Central's action to-day was thilt two leading members of the team were away from town, and two others had to.go to Trenthsirii frir'class firing. The Rev. E. 0. Blamires, one of tho vice-presidents of the club, stated to a reporter last night that lie wits exceedingly sorry that ahytliihg of .the kind .had happened, and he would like to see the team go to Petone. He was also of opinion that the decision, and the formulation of reasons therefor, had not been dono by tli© committee of tho cltlb.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130329.2.28

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1710, 29 March 1913, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
282

REGRETTABLE. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1710, 29 March 1913, Page 5

REGRETTABLE. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1710, 29 March 1913, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert