Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BROOKLYN CAR DISPUTE.

ARGUMENT IS COUHT, Tho case in which Horace Jury is charged by the Tramways Department for fail' ing to leave <1 Brooklyn tram when, ordered to do so by (he conductor, was coii(inued at 'tho Magistrate's Court yesterday before Mr. W. G. Riddell, S.M. Jlr. O'Lcary appeared for the defendant Jury, and M.r, O'Sliea represented tho Tramways Department. Mr. O'Leary recalled the witness John Curry, who gave evidence to tho effect that the person who was previously stated to have got out of the compartment in which tho defendant was in when return, in;; to Manners Street got out of a differ- • ent compirtment. Addressing the Court, Mr. O'LcaTy said that, the evidence given on behalf of his client went to show that there wcro only ten persons in the compartment in which ' the defendant was when the conductor ordered him out. He had called several witnesses, who supported that. This caso shewed that the by-law had been forcibly applied by Conductor Turner. If his Worship held that tho by-law was reasonable, he would still havo power to dismiss tho case under Section !)2 of tho Justices of the Peace Act, 1908. Counsel contended that either the conductor had mado a mistake or he had unreasonably exercised his discretion. The conductor had-persisted in liis statement that tho car was overcrowded when it was aot so. Mr. O'Shca said that tho by-law wm reasonable in every respect. Tho conductor was entitled to allow only those, who could find seats to Tido on tho car. Ho referred to the' accident which occurred on tho Brooklyn lin<? some time ago, aad said* that tho then Minister for Publio Works (Mr. It. M'Kenzie) had since mado the regulation, in order to conserve tho safety of the public. There was no doubt that the regulation when made caused consternation amongst the residents of Brooklyn. It was also stipulated by tho Publio Works Department that thero should bo at least 1G inches of space for each passengei>—that only allowed four persons on ■each scat. In the interests of tho publio . the corporation had invested the conductor with the discretionary power. Tho oonductor lcuew that. Tho traffic on the BrookT>;i and .Wadestown lines could not lie carried out if such discretionary powe? wcro not left to the conductor. ■ His Worship reserved decision.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130312.2.25

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1696, 12 March 1913, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
388

BROOKLYN CAR DISPUTE. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1696, 12 March 1913, Page 6

BROOKLYN CAR DISPUTE. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1696, 12 March 1913, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert