A WILL CASE.
TESTAMENTARY CAPACITY. (By. Telegraph.—Press Association.) Invercargill, March 7. ' • !At the-Supreme Court to-day, Sir Joshua jiWilUams lieard,the case of Caroline Cartj»./e.Kt v. C. S. Longuet and the Trustees 1 .lie Church of England, claiming revocation' of probate of the will of Dora Clark (plaintiff's mother); and asking that the ' will be declared void. -Plaintiff claimed that 'her ! ulother, who had suffered from ■ paralytic seizures,, did not haVo . testa- " xneutary capacity, when making her will, ■which left her only a life interest in the. estate. The defendant, who was the :" , testatrix's solicitor, and also sole executor, gave'evidence that (Mrs. Clark displayed undoubted testamentary capacity. She disliked her daughter's. hidbnnd, and in , orderto avoid the possibility of his. getI ting th 6 money left her daughter ■ only a. •• life interest in the estate, going to the, , ■ Church of England ultimately. Medical evidence was given by Dr. Ewart that Mrs. Clark was quifce.capable Of properly expressing her intentions at the time the will was made. Sir Joshua Williams Rave judgment for the defendant, saying that testamentary capacity had been abundantly proved. ' .
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130308.2.26
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1693, 8 March 1913, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
180A WILL CASE. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1693, 8 March 1913, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.