ST. HELEN'S HOME INQUIRY.
MEDICAL ETIQUETTE. (By Telegraph.—Press Association.) Auckland? Starch 4. In the course of evidence at tho St. Helen's Homo inquiry, Dr. Florence Keller said, in answer lo a question, that some four years ago she had been refused assistance by another doctor in a serious case becauso she was ndt ri member of tho British Mwlical Association. In commenting on this, his TTorshit) .said that if such a state of things existed ho thought it was an, absolutely scandalous thing that in a caso of : life and death a doctor should refuse to help a fellowpiactitiouor just becauso tho latter did not happen to bo a member of the British Medical Association, and.if it were true it sliftuld bo well thrashed but. Mr. Mays said that ho did not see any necessity to thrash the matter out, except so far as it affected the inquiry, but- fvp could dispose of the story "ill one aci" '• putting another medical man in tho box who could explain everything."
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130305.2.83
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1690, 5 March 1913, Page 8
Word count
Tapeke kupu
169ST. HELEN'S HOME INQUIRY. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1690, 5 March 1913, Page 8
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in