Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EXHUME THE BODY?

MRS. HOULT'S CASE. , ■ - . ■■ ' / CORONER SAYS NOT NECESSARY. ' The coronial inquiry into the death of Jessie Edith' Hoult/ alias Richards, was concluded by Dr. M'Arthur, S.M., on Saturday morning. Some weeks ago Mrs. Hoult was removed from a house'in/Lome Street to the public hospital, where she died a while later. When Dr. M'Arthur, S.M., proceeded to the hospital to view the body and hold ah inquest, Jie discovered that the body had been buried. At the dnquest this' fact gave rise to a considerable dialogue between the coroner and the hospital doctors. However, the inquest was adjourned at the request of Senior-Sergeant Rutledge, who wished to trace certain pills and nietVcine to their source. ■ When the inquiry was resumed on Saturday, Sergeant Rutledge, stated that hehart been unable;to ascertain where tho pills and medicine had beeni obtained, and that lie had no further evidence to produce. Dr. M'Arthur: Before'saying what the cause of death is, I want to say this: that thero has evidently been a misunderstanding between'the-doctors at the hospital (there aro two concerned) and tho coroner. As coroner I am perfectly satisfied that my instructions to the police were that an inquest was necessary.:, But, through some misunderstanding, the hospital authorities camo to the conclusion that an inquest was not neccssnry, and the body was buried without the certificate to bury having been arnnted. The Act, I know, is very vague, but there is distinction.between a doctor being able to give a certificate of the cause of death and the coroner giving a certificate of burial. T have /no doubt a misi "prehension took place on : tiie riart of the hospital doctors, but, baring"' taken the full evidence, I have no hesitation in saying that the full and fair decision was according to the medical evidence. The only thing is I have not got tho body. T do not consider it necessary to cihuino tuo body which I have not .viewed, as no suspicious circumstances have been adduced. The verdict was that .Mrs. Hoult had died through lysol burning.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130224.2.71

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, 24 February 1913, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
343

EXHUME THE BODY? Dominion, 24 February 1913, Page 6

EXHUME THE BODY? Dominion, 24 February 1913, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert