PRIVY COUNCIL APPEALS.
. THREE AUSTRALIAN CASES. ' By Telegraph—Press Association—Oopyritht London, February 19. In the case of King versus the Adelaide Steamship Company; special leave to ippeal to the Privy Council was granted. i.'ho hearing was fixed for early next term. . , In the case Gordon versus the Colonial Sugar Refining Company, a petition to rescind an order granting spccial leave to appeal, was postponed for a week in order to ascertain definitely whether the Royal Commission on Sugar had delivered its final roport. In the case M'Laughlin versus the City Bank, Sydney, special leave to appeal was granted with regard to tho order of 1912, but leavo was refused with regard to an ocdor of 190!), which their Lordships considered final.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130221.2.94
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1680, 21 February 1913, Page 9
Word count
Tapeke kupu
120PRIVY COUNCIL APPEALS. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1680, 21 February 1913, Page 9
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in