Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POISON ON FRUIT?

NOT THE SLIGHTEST DANGER.

In yesterday's Dominion thcro appeared a paragraph giving Hie opinion of-a Wuugauui medical man that tho recent poisonings wero duo, in some cases io urseunto of lead used in the. spray. With rcferenco to this, a reporter 'culledon Mr. T. W. Kirk, Kircclur of Orchardv wlio nuppiied tlio lollowing iiitoniialkim "The /message irom Uanganui," said' Mr. Kirk, "is likely to be misleading, as (lie doctor is reported to advise the peeling of iruit in all cases, so as "to avoid the' danger of taking such a strong poison into the system. It is .worthy of noto that stone fruits, also raspberries, straw-, berries, etc., are not sprayed with luid acetate, so those Can be excluded from the doctor's category,

Mr. kirk then mentioaed a .report on (his particular spray ■by Dr.- Sl'l'.auriii, Government Analyst, which appeared ia the annual report of the Agricultural Department lor 1910. The report reads:—; "Some discussion on the subject of whether arsohale-of-lead spray is dangeiotis to persons consuming apples and pears.appeared in the New Zealand press last Mason. In order, thereWrc, ; .to' set tho tfuistion at rest,- and obtain authoritative pronouncement, it was arranged (hat tho officer's of tho Public Health Depnrlincut 'should visit tho Government orchard at Weraroa and (I),gather.some fruit from frees regularly sprayed during'tho season;. (2) to see a tree sprayed, and theirtsolvc3 gather tho fruit directly . the" .Jsji'rny, w,is dry.. ■ • ' ':■■■■. ; ' ,•,.'"" .This having been done,, the mvc-stiga-tions by Dr. M'Laurin showed that thcro was absolutely no 1 danger to health from eating apples so sprayed. In order'to estimate, the amount of arsCriic on Hio apples they were (rented'with appropnato solvents, and tho solution > so: obtairied analysed. ■.■■,- • These results showed that the, apples sprayed with arsenate of lead in'' the usual," commercial way during the season contain such minuto traces of lead and arsenic that they may be eaten with perfect safety. In fact, the amount of arsenic is so'small that one, would requireto consume two bushels'of ; apples (60%.), skins and nil, to get,merely a medical doso of arsenic. . Even in the case, 'if ("apples sprayed immediately before picking, two, or .three pounds could, bo eaten, without producing,serious results,". '~, ,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130213.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1673, 13 February 1913, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
363

POISON ON FRUIT? Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1673, 13 February 1913, Page 4

POISON ON FRUIT? Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1673, 13 February 1913, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert