J. D. WILLIAMS CASE.
' CHARGE. WITHDRAWN. ' Ur Teleeraph—Pren Amoclatton—CoßXrlgnl , ;'■'• (Rec. February 11, 8.45 p.m.), < Sydn'Yj February: li. When tho charge- against James Dixon •Williams, manager of the Greater J. D. Williams Amusement Company,'of abetting the forgery' of oi 6har© order was called to-day, ~ u Counsel for tho prosecution announced that he and. tho counsel: for the defence had gone thoroughly into the case on account of tho public matters involved, and agreed that Williams, ik taking the step he did, had", aoted bona fide and in tho interests of the shareholders, and ' ,ho thought the.explanation put before him by counsel convinced him that the proper course to, pursue in the interests of tho shareholders .was not" to 'proceed' further with the': charge. ". ' '.."'" Counsel for tho defence stated that Williams, assantedito this course, realising it was in the interests of the company and the shareholders.., Ho was also of opinion that the quarrel should cease between the parties as, tho explanation given.wis satisfactory and' Williams should be' honourably discharged.... .vr*"" • .■ . Tlioi'chargo iwos thereupon withdrawn, and ■Williams was' discharged..
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130212.2.65
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1672, 12 February 1913, Page 8
Word count
Tapeke kupu
177J. D. WILLIAMS CASE. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1672, 12 February 1913, Page 8
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in