Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

(Before Dr. M*Arthur,-SJI.) : : ' ''■'■■' CIVIL CASES. : • . COMMISSION CLAIM PAILS.' . Dr. M'Arthur, S.M., delivered.judgment in tlio case in which John Henry Hooper, commission agent, Wellington, sued Edward Law, farmer, for;..£Bo.as.commission on the sale'bf Law's, farm 'at -Shannon to one George-Bell, now. deceased,. ~ His Worship held that-the-evidence of tho plaintiff, and the correspondence put in, did not disclose a'.'binding' contract between Law and' Bell, and that therefore Hooper was not entitled to commission. : Judgment was for. the defendant '■'•; .A MILKING MACHINE.,' ' \ J. B.'MacEwan and Co., Wellington, 'sued T.. A. B. • commission' agent, Levin, for J% 35., as commission, on the salo of a milking-machine. Mr. D. M. lindlny appeared for tho plaintiff, and .Mr.-E. J. Fitzgibbbn for the defendant:.' ■ , ■ .;:■-,■;■ ; Judgment was reserved. ; , MOTOIt-CAR COVER. . Hntrick and' Co., merchants, proceeded against A. (5. Crow, cycie dealer, Woodyille, for £l IDs. Gd., which, plaintiffs alleged, was due 1 respecting the salo of;tho cover of a motor-car;: ■ Mr.'E.:.J. Fitzibbon represented • the plaintiff, and Mr. E. C. Levvoy represented the defendant. ■ ..-•- : Tho defendant stated that the price of the cover was included in tho price paid .for the motor-car. •■•-.' ' . His Worship said that ho considered 1 hat tho weight of evidence was in favour of the defendant, for whom ho gave judg- . incnt. KENT CLAIM. In the case of Charles It; Paraln, estato agent, Wellington, versus George Charlton; farmer, Duuedin, a rent claim for .010 55., judgment was given for the plaintiff, with costs £a os. Gd.. - UNDEFENDED. PASES. '.' " In' the following cases judgment was'enered for tho plaintiff by default:—Wol-' lwmnn and Co. v. Robert King, ,£l'l)s. 2d., costs is.; Thompson' Bins;, Ltd., v. Lawrence and M'Carfhy, £1 ss„ costs 55.; Commercial Agency, Ltd.,-v. O. W. Bonningtun, JIIO 15s. ■ 2d., costs-VEMOs.Gd.; 11. I'rico i,iul Co.,* Ltd., v. Bennett and Co., X 5 55., costs-'XI 3s. Gd-.; Horaco Danvors Baker ni>d Ellen Baker v. John I'hil--lips, .I'll lis., ei.sl.-j J:l lis. lid.; H. C. Gibbons ai;.l Co., Lid:, v, 'Frederick Simmonds and Co.. lid., costs 10s.: Walter 'Stanton and .William Grant Davillo Evans {

v. George. M'Gregor, ,£5 75.'4 d., costs ill ds. bd.i Charles Pratt and Co. v. -Edmund Stratford, M&s.; costs lis.; samo v. John M'Garrie, £1 is., costs 155.; sanio v. Honry.Downs,.-.JEIGiIGs; Gd., costs i!l' 16s. Gd.; same v..Prank Galyor, .£3 175., costs il.7s..6d.;.same v. Frank Misskeivski, .£2 35., costs-195.; same v. Ernest Sowry, £6 IBs. 0d.,-costs .£2 Bs. Gd.; Rosenberg and Coi v.-Robert'"Campbell, 165., costs 55.; same v. 1L Barclay Olivei'V '£2ss. Gd., costs 55.; Commercial Agency, Ltd., v. E.-Gorrish, 175., costs 155.; Cnd- ■ bury..Bros., Ltd.,;.v. vGeorge- Kirby, .£3 lis. Gd., costs' 55.; J. B.'MaeEivrin and Co.,"Ltd.,-v. A\Y H. Rehnie, .1:3 2s; 5d., costs 10s.; Agricultural;' l " Pastoral, "and Pood Co., Ltd., v. Christchurch Poultry Supplies Co., 18s., costs 55.; J. B. MacEwan and Co., Ltd., v. Morion M'Konzio, JC67"; ■ 13s. ■ 3d., • costs M ::■ Is.' ■ fld.; Commercial Agency,' Ltd., v. John Hagcrty, ,£1 25., coats 55.; 6amo v. Alexander Charles B.: Munro, £\i 155., costs £1 ISs. Gd.; same v. Patrick Ring, £1 ss. Gd., costs ss.jsamo v. John Adams, .04 -l!)s. -2d., costs •lOs;; .same' v. -Chnrlvs Heima, £\, costs 10s,; samo-v. -William Herbert Eecles, '£l • 10s., costs ss.' A .WHEELWRIGHT'S . ACCOUNT. - . ; (Before-for) W. G. Eiddell; S.M.j i Michael-M'Grath.wheolwrigM', Wellington, sued Mrs. S. J. Bird, Wellington, for £H Bs. 6d., for repairing a vehicle;'and horse-shoeing. : ' ■ Mr. V.,15. Willis appeared for tho plaintin", and Mr. E. Kennedy for tlio defendant. ' ' • Defendant, declared that tho "work had been done for her «m; and tho Court nonsuited tho plaintiff. . ,'•■■ POLICE LIST (Before Mr, W. ; . G.. Riddell r Kenneth Green was remanded- till February. 12 on « charge of his having stolon a lady's hand-bag, a purse,'nud arils', 7.Jd- in money, from 1 the -person of Ellen Sunderland. .' ~ . ~"...) •For - Insobriety, Lilian- Ornioiidb was fined - 55., ; John M'Carthy; ,10s;, and John Mansfield 'was sentenced, lo 'one month's imprisonment. •Irank Quale was sentenced to ono week's imprisonment for having deserted from ' tho steamer Tiuak'na.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130207.2.84.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1668, 7 February 1913, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
654

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1668, 7 February 1913, Page 8

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1668, 7 February 1913, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert