Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ELLERSLIE V. TRENTHAM.

• Sir,—Surely your correspondent "Punter" must liavo only ono eve, and that a Wellington one, or ho could not mako the absurd statements you quote in comparing the above courses'. Ho finds the 17milo train journey to Trehtham, mostly through poor barren country, less tedious than tlio 4-milo run to Ellcrslic,' through tho Domain plantations,' though busy Newmarket and past smiling villas with neat gardens right up to tho gato of the course. Punter's" other comparisons aro just as ridiculous as thoso regarding the train journey. Few peoplo will cavil at tho Auckland rule excluding. infante of tender years'from tho grandstand en-' closure. Possibly your correspondent belongs' to this latter class, honce the tears. —I am, etc., ■ UNBIASED,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130201.2.73.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1663, 1 February 1913, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
120

ELLERSLIE V. TRENTHAM. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1663, 1 February 1913, Page 6

ELLERSLIE V. TRENTHAM. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1663, 1 February 1913, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert