Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RURAL HOUSING.

„ — * .. BETTER HOUSES OR BETTER : WAGES. , By Tdegraph-Press Association-Copyright ■■■■, London, January 17. Tho Rural Housing Bill was read a second time in the Honse.of lords. , Lord Aahby St., Ledgers declared that" tho finance proposals of the measure were Unsound, and the Government would not accept it. Land-owners wero not too poor to. build cottiges, but labourers were too .poor, to.pay Tent, M'they did not re- .« oeive - a,., living \wage., : Agriculturists : could ■ well afford- to p»ya> minimum' frage. ' Lord Salisbury . dropped • tho Bill.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130120.2.44

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1652, 20 January 1913, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
83

RURAL HOUSING. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1652, 20 January 1913, Page 7

RURAL HOUSING. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1652, 20 January 1913, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert