Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

IN CHAA[BEHS.-LIDEL CASE. An interlocutory matter was dealt with in the Supreme Court in Chambers yesterday by Mr. Justics,Chapman in connection with the alleged libel action, William Alexander Bell v. Milo Kow. .Defendant moved to strike out certain wnrd« in the statement of claim, and to amend the statement b.v separating the damages in vesppiit of each cause of action. ' His Honour made tin- order in respect of tin; separation uf damages, ami in re. jfa'ril to Hie other part of the motion made a nolii that alleged publication to "Bradbnry and others" referred to one occasion. Costs of the motion arc to be costs in the action. ■Mr. T. S. Vvoston appeared in support of the defendant's motion, while Mr, M, Jlyors onpowd it on behalf of the t>loiuJiff. .

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19121220.2.93.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1628, 20 December 1912, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
132

SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1628, 20 December 1912, Page 8

SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1628, 20 December 1912, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert