Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE FISCAL ISSUE.

SPEECH, BY MR. BONAR LAW. FOOD TAXES. A COLONIAL CONFERENCE. Bv Telegraph—Press Association-Copyright (Rec. December 17, 9.25 p.m.) London, December 17. Mr. Bonar Law (Leader of the Unionist Party), speaking at Ashton-Under-Lync,'said, that the.greatest problem that statesman were faced with was how to obtain a fairer method of distributing industrial wealth. Ho believed that theremedy lay in co-operation, assisted by a fair fiscal system. '

If, he continued,'.the Unionists were, entrusted with legislative power, they did not intend to impose food taxes without first convening a colonial' conference to consider the whole question of preferential trade. The question of food duties, said the speaker, could only arise after a deliberative conference. That was why he objected to submit' such proposals to a referendum.

In dealing with-food duties, said the Unionist Leader,.an essential condition should be that the burdens of the poorer classes would' not be increased. The ideal policy was free-trade within the Empire, but it was impossible to get it now with our colonies, though a system of preference, would' tend ultimately in ■ that direction. We could have free-trade with India to-morrow. India feared, not competition with Britain, but competition with Japan. ,

"The'whole experience of tho civilised world," ho said, "is hostile to the British- fiscal system. Our colonies abandoned it, and no serious politician in any country proposes to return thereto."

The Unionists did'not intend by-a protective policy to foster unnatural industries, but. would impose -duties, lower than •any other industrial country. They, would not encourage the building-up. of monopolies, but merely intended.to give their own workmen preference in their own market; They would be unable to compete with trade rivals and also secure the largest preference possible in overseas 'markets*. The Unionist ; party promised clearly to define the nature of the duties before the general election. It was hoped that it would not be necessary to impose' any more than a duty on .wheat.■■-• If, after a conference with the colonies, such duties were regarded as unnecessary, they would never beimpossd.' , .''■''.

. NO POSTPONEMENT. '■•'■■• London,.December 17, Mr. Austen' Chamberlain,, speaking at Carlisle, said that any suggestion in the nature of a postponement of. .tariff reform would t split the Unionist party from top to bottom, and shake - public confi-dence-in, their honesty and good faith.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19121218.2.42

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1626, 18 December 1912, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
378

THE FISCAL ISSUE. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1626, 18 December 1912, Page 7

THE FISCAL ISSUE. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1626, 18 December 1912, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert