Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COLONIAL MEAT.

NO UNIONIST TAX INTENDED. By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright (Eec. December 16, 9.5 p.m.) London, December 16. Mr.. Bonar Law, Leader of the Opposition), writing to a correspondent, declared that the Unionists did not. intend to impose a tax on colonial wheat.

Sir John Simon, Solicitor-General, criticising Lord Lansdowno's recent speech at the Albert Hall, asked whether tho Tariff Reformers intended to tax colonial articles of food. Was it the Unionist policy to tax colonial produce, thus causing a grievance to the British consumer by increasing: food prices and a grievance to tho colonial producer, who would be denied free access to the Motherland's markets?

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19121217.2.51

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1625, 17 December 1912, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
105

COLONIAL MEAT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1625, 17 December 1912, Page 7

COLONIAL MEAT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1625, 17 December 1912, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert