Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REFERENDUM BILLS.

COMMONWEALTH AND STATES WIDER POWERS SOUGHT. By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright Melbourne, November 20. The Referendum Bills for the amendment of tho Commonwealth Constitution wore debated in. the House of Representatives yesterday. The proposed amendments will give tho Commonwealth power to make laws with regard to trade and commerce generally, corporations, Labour matters, and to nationalise monopolies. Mr. Hughes, Attorney-General, in moving the second reading of tho Referendum Bill, dealing with trade and commerce, claimed full powers to alter the Constitution. It was never protended, he said, that the Commonwealth was a finished product that conld stand for all time. The Government was attempting to breathe into the Constitution the breath of modern life. He denied there was any attempt to establish unification, and argued the necessity, in view of the rocent High Court decisions, for stronger powers -for the Federal Government to deal with industrial matters, trusts, and oombines. There were trusts in Australia, but tho Federal Government was powerless to reach them. The Beef Trust already had a footing, and under the present law was freo to exploit Australia as it had dono in America. Mr. Deakin, Leader of the Opposition, declared there was a unanimous feeling that there was apt to be an encroachment by. trusts, but he foresaw more dangers still—the prospects of a system of naI tionalisation. The country had not reached a stage l where it was. prepared to change the whole character of the Constitution. The present proposals were an attempt to annex the powers of the Legislatures. The interests of Australia could be served by loyal allegiance to Federal principles. The new proposals would produce the exactly opposite effect. " Mr. Hughes subsequently moved the second reading of a Referendum Bill giving powers to deal with corporations. He instanced the Coal Vend and Sugar Company prosecutions as cases in which wider powers were deeded. ■'

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19121121.2.39

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1603, 21 November 1912, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
311

REFERENDUM BILLS. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1603, 21 November 1912, Page 5

REFERENDUM BILLS. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1603, 21 November 1912, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert