Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

: (Before Mr. W. G. Kiddell, S.M.) ' BETTING AT THENTHAM. \ ANOTHEK BOOKMAKEE PINED. Arohibald Boyd was charged with, being a bookmaker, having betted at tho Tr«ithimi racecourse on October 28.' 'I'he evidence given , by Detective-Ser-geant Chssells,. Constable Smyth, • Constable M'Lelland, Racecourse-Detective Waldrou, and Eacccourse-Detective Kreitzer was somewhat similar to that given by them oh the previous day in the case in which Thomas Dalton was convicted on a like charge and fined J225.. The point of the evidence was that Daltpn had been taking tho bete, and Boyd had been booking them, and that the two had been acting together. B6yd gave evidence to the effect that he had not made any bets, and that he had not received any : .payinent from DaltonWitness was handed the race-book, in which it was suggested ho had been niakingiehtries. ' ' Can you-'explainthosa entries?" asked Sheehan. ■ Boyd: Yes; explain anything. W,oll, -what/'is your • explanation P—lt looks; as if I have been working them out on .j;he Chinese system. • Are you in ..tho. habit of .doing that?— Yes';jl aJnWcry superstitious. That is your explanation?— Yes, Mr. W. Perry, counsel for defendant Boyd, in addressing the Court, contended that no evidence had been tendered to show that-Boyd had bsen making bets. Sub-Inspector Sheohan sought to establish that "bookmaker," in respect of this charge, "included bookmaker's clerk." Boyd was convicted, and fined .£2O, the minimum penalty. Mr. Perry applied for leave to appeal and this was granted on payment of the fine, plus' .£8 Bs. TWO STOWAWAYS. William Bailey and Thomas ■ O'Hara were acoused of having travelled from Sydney to Wellington without having paid the fare. Mr. E. 31. Sladden appeared for Bailey, and said that that defendant was a Wellington man, who had signed on with a steamer which was going to San Francisco and back. Bailey had been returned to Sydney, although lie had all along been under the impression that he would be brought back to Wellington. Each defendant was fined £i 4s. (tho amount of tho faro)—in default, fourteen days' imprisonment. Bailey was allowed 48 hours' time, in which to pay the fine. INSOBRIETY. For insobriety, Michael Gregory was fined .£l. BOOKSELLER'S CLAIM. (Before Dr. A. M'Arthur, S.M.) Dr. M'Arthur, S.H., hi his civil jurisdiction, delivered judgment in the cuss of G. I;. Cole, bookseller, Cartcrton, against Whitcombo and Tombs, Wellington, in which plaintiff claimed X 26 55., as damages for 300 boxes of hand-made writing-, paper which, it was said, the defendants had agreed to forward to the plaintiff, but had not done so. His Worship gave judgment in favour of the plaintiff for with costs.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19121114.2.83

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1597, 14 November 1912, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
434

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1597, 14 November 1912, Page 9

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1597, 14 November 1912, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert