Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAUISTRATE'S COURT.

(Before Dr. A.M'Arthur, .S,M.) ] . FIREMAN'S "ACT, .;'•'. \ ALTERS DISCHARGE TICKET. ; Tiobert T.umon, ■ a fireman, was charged i at the Magistrate's Court yesterday, be- ! fore Six. A. WArthiir, S.M., with having [ altered his certificate o£ discharge. ; Captain G. G. Smith. Marine Super- \ ■ intendeut, prosecuted, and the accused \ ~ pleaded guilty. , ;' lie w'as charged under Section 57 of the • Shipping .and Seamen. Act, 190S, relating to' tho discharge of seamen, which states: "Bvery , 'person'is guilty ..of a crime who " orgfs or fraudulently alters any cei'ti.fieato of discharge." His Worship'remarked that accused was liable to 12 months' imprisonment. A , 'sentence of three months' imprisonment ;■ Was imposed. .... .. I -STOLEN CLOtSeS~AXD BRUSHES., John 'David Speight pleaded guilty to a i charge, of insobriety,, and was convicted | . ind discharged. Uo was further charged i With the, theft of a clothes brush valued f at 25., tho property of Jeremiah Sullivan, , and also with the theft of a hair 'brush, ..- valiied at 45., the . property .of Alexander , "Jl'Dmiald. Accused pleaded not guilty. Evidence, was giveii to. tho .effofet that a accused was detected.iit a room in the ;. Masonic Hotel with the brushes in' his , possession. He was unsober cit the. time . of his arrest.. His Worship scntenwji accused to three I months" imprisonment on each charge, the sHitences'to run concurrently. ; • '. ' . ' INSOBRIETY. ' David Smith was fined 20s;, in default seven days' imprisonment, for insobriety. On.a similar charge, -JeSsie Burns was fined 405., in default 11. days' imprisonment. A prohibition,:" order was issued ■ f against tne last offender. u ''DESIGN ON PAPER BAGS.:., - S ReH and Roid, of Wellington, general lS merchant?, sued ,fl; J.' .Wyatt, -grocery',of r ;_ Worser Bay, claiming: £& 7s: ld. : for work '" tione , and material in ■ connectibn■ :v. - Lth , printed paper bags supplied to defendant, d 111 , . , T. S, Wsston ' appeared for t)ia i. plaintiffs aud Mr. ,T.. R. Meredith for 5 s defendant. . "'• ' Evidence Was given to the effect that f- AVyatt had declined, to pay . for. 19,100 t> papor bags wliinh he had , received per ?" order, hecause thfe .advertisement wincht • was on each bag. did not bear his correct i> initials. The , initials appeared. "W.'.J." instead of "H. J." On. discove'ring this,, i- 'Wyatt then snut thp bags backio have" Is tho \:W" obliterated and tlw "H"-sulj-in stitutdd. The work was' ca-yried out by s- rubber stamp., and thp le.ttier.' : "ft" was it iJlTicod alongside the "W"," Virhicli . n-as crossed out/ When this altetatbn had le betm carried out, the hags were once n'ore e- dispiitehed to defendant' (Wyatt), but id the latter, after ■inspecting- theiri, fermed ie. the opinion that .the alteration,.was not a satisfactory "job," and that the display n-. :.w.C)uld harm'.Mf -Jjusiness.'if.he used the; '"■' b'sßS. , '" fliercfore, sent them back, and' »n refused payment,. •■'.-■ ' ■ fi-" : His Worship gave judgment for plain■i-. tiffs 'for■• &", with ■ Cp'ttvt ;.costs- -;jB3 25... is- agiunst Wyatt. ' ■ / \ "' " , «' ■" ' ;'. UNDEFENDED: CASES.. , _ ( u Judgnjent by default for'plaintiff Was .J,, givea in the .following cases :■+■ ■ ■ "Charles Pratt and Co. v. -lifartha ,i, M'Gregor, 'JE73 12s. id., costs 10s. 9d.; U Public Trustee v. Tjionias; Pote, .£]& 155., ' co'sts M 1%; Commercial Agency, Iti.. „„■ '(assigmes) V.'-'G. M'Gregor, 4)5 Gs. 5d., II -ebsi-s :JEI Ss. Gd.; Mount Bros. v. Frederick \. ; Wolff,. J.3-11S..- Hit,' costs 10s.;..Charles u. .Edwards .v. Jlitthew-Wliclaji,' , (is. Gd., if- costs' 125.; H. Price and Co., Ltd., v. i : Ernest Bartletti 16s, 3d., costs M 10s.' f 6d.; Gear Meat Company v. C. „. , £\ 95,. 9d.. costs ss. j Comniercial..Agenc.y, "i W.d.,v..M"rS'. M. A. Clapham, 41G 7s. 4d., '" .costs His. Cd.; United Co- . operative. Association :v. William Mills, ■£•■!• 15S. Id., costs 155.? G. V. 'Simpson v. I Robert Hull, JSI2 Gs. Ud., costs 53, 155. Bd.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19121101.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1586, 1 November 1912, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
602

MAUISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1586, 1 November 1912, Page 3

MAUISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1586, 1 November 1912, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert