ORDER OF CASES.

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1515, 10 August 1912, Page 3

ORDER OF CASES.

COMING CIVIL SESSION. The civil sessions of tho Supreme Court commence* on Monday net!:. The list was called over in Chambers lieforo Mr. JusHco Chapman yesterday, a'nd tlic following fixtures were made:— Monday, August 12. Edward Jns. Ix-slio Payno t. Win. Henry I'nyiie, accounts, etc., !>eforo a judgo alone. Tuesday, August 13. Tlios. Hood v. Jnn." Braid, claim for £501 damages for alleged slander, before, a judgo and a common jury of twelve. Wednesday, August 14. Easson, Ltd.. v. A. Huirick and Co., Ltd., claim for ,£'JIG I,ls. Jd., damage.? for alleged breach of contract, lieforo a judge and a common jury of twelve. Thursday, August 15. Winifred Annie Elliston v. Charles Arthur Elliston, petition for divorce, before, .a judgo alone. Monday, August 13. John. Wallace Easson imd Percy George Easson v. the Wellington City Corporation, claim for .£1.500 for alleged injury to land, beforo a judgo alone. Tuesday, August 20. Charles IMnry Osmond and others v. ffti. Eobertson M'Leod, claim for J5509 damages for loss alleged to have been caused by misrepresentation, beforo a judgo and a common jury of twelve. Wednesday. August 21. Chow Yo Quin v. George Pjnnock and Beatrice Pinnock, claim for ,£350 damages alleged to be due for causing bodily harm, before a judge and a commoa jury of four. Thursday, August 22. The following divorce, cases will be heard before a judge alono:—John Starr v. Alice Muriel Starr and Charles D. Hargreaves; Daisy Grace Price v. William Alfred Price; Lilv Hanson v. Christopher Cecil Hanson; Thos. Edgar Green v. Ethel May Green; Laura Margaret M'lnnes v. Alexander M'lnnes; Richard John Hastedt v. Mary Ellen Hastedt and Wm. Jas. Longhurst; Robt. Chas. Pliimostor v. Selina Phomister; Eobt. Henry Ker v. Helena Mabel Ivor and Arthur Wilson; Margaret Ann Sievers v. Arthur Wm. Sievers; and Moir v. Moir. Thursday, August 29. The Official Assignee v. Henry Fielder and Co., claim for recovery of furniture, etc., before a judge alono. OTHER CASES. The cases on the list for which no fixture has been made are as follow.— ' Before a Common Jurv of Twelve. D. G. M'Girr v. f helps, Wilson and Co., claim for .£514 19s. 6d., damages alleged to Im> due for bodily injuries. Archibald Arthur Brown v. Arabella Hadfield and others, claim for .£2527 10s., damages alleged to be due for destruction of property. Frederick John Korthcott v. Henry Hughes, Ltd., claim for £1400 damages for alleged breach of contract. Before a Judge Alono. ■ Eamaiios Kairooz v. Mary Kairooz, claim for possession of land, etc. James Diysdale V. William Joseph Ferkins and Annie Ferkins, claim for .£2.711 6s. lid., alleged to be due for goods supplied, and accounts, etc. Louis. Daroux .v. George Hamill, claim for specific performance, elc. • H.M. the' King v. tho Merchants' Association of New-Zealand, claim for penalties-' for alleged breach of Commercial •Trusts-Act. ■■■■■■■■■■■.■ ■ .H.M. the King v. Levin and Co., Ltd.. and others, claim for penalties for alleged breach of the Commercial Trusts Act. and Co.,- Ltd., v. Alice Mary Anstis, claim for .£29103. 6d., alleged to be due' for goods delivered. The Public Trustee v. Violet Maud Brewer and others, declaration,': etc. John Dnthie v. Edith Dorothy Ellis and John 'Eli Ellis, claim for £500 dr.tnnges, alleged ; tq.ho due for obstructing stream. •••• <■••« ■■'■ Walter Mark Exton y. John Wells Chapman, claim for rescission of agreement, etc. . John Keir v. Martin Hurrell-.and Sneddon, claim for jCIGiS 3s. 10d., alleged to' bo duo for work done. Lilias Anno Watson t. Jessie Watson and Robert T. Watson, declaration, etc.