DELIVERY REFUSED.

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1481, 2 July 1912, Page 8

DELIVERY REFUSED.

SKKD irERCnAXTS AXD FAKXIEKS AX LAW. (By Telcfraph.-Prcsn A.'Mciation.) Palmcrston, July. 1. A ease of importance to farmers anil «<?'.'(! iiH'tcli.'inis ocpunied Hie Sumvino Crnirt. for tlirre ilavs Mr. Juslict? Cooper presiiliiiß. ■ Tloililcr and Tnlley, T.W., lioiirM seventy ncri-s of slondins eron—errslod (logstail -from Ellis .Urns.. Bulls, but refused to feilie, delivery on the irroiiiir] dial l.lio sewl was »'.| (irst-clnAs anil Unit the area was more tliiin stipulated. On Hit , lnUw ground nil inlerestins nonsuit point ivns raised liy Mr. Myers, counsel for the dpfence, viz.. Hint Hie rontrart unto slated that Kllis Urns, undertook to supply seed from 70 acres, and under Ihe Sale of Goods \.-t, n- In quantity, that had to l>; txm-Wy fuliillfil.

On the nthi'V hnnd. it wns hold tin I- a contract for .ivo'i was not. n contract for mi <-'Xiicr (luantity within the I'.efmition nf Ihe Sale nf QnoiU Act, and (lint il would )w inipnssiMo for it lo ho so rooiinlccl. even if Hut am was estimated ami Hfli- acconlini! 11> survey, ami il would 1«> nec»s-,iry for n surveyor In follow Hi? harvesters lo get the exact inei-urein^nt*. lloffiuliiiil- :iiliiiill"il Hint their rmilrarl form* ilid not provide for "more or less," but- for mchH- are'is. The point was reserved, but on I hi' other nni-il—that 111" wed was mil fii^l-rln"— imlifiiiPiit was irivon for jilniiilitlV, Ellis' Pros., lii-i lli.ii:.ur holding lluir defendants linil no right lo reject tlio teed.