JUDGE AND SOLICITOR.
SEVERE COMMENT ON LAND DEAL. (By Teicgra-Pll"-Press Association.) Auckland, May 25. Mr. Justice Edwards made tevere comment in ths Supreme Court case Allwooil v. SutcliJTe, in which a claim was made for alleged fraudulent misrepresentation in a loiid transaction. Edmund Jlahoney gavo evidence that he acted as solicitor for both parties. Ho stated that ha warned Allwood lie was buying a "pig in a poke," but admitted lie "did not tell him that the land he was acquiring liad been bought by Sutcliffc n few weeks beforo for <£100, though the consideration given by Allwood was equivalent to XSOO. His Honour said he lind no desire to say anything to hurt Mchoney's feelings, but it' was his absolute duly to have ■ warned plaintiff definitely in wriling that the contract wns an inequitable one. No mnn could under tlis circumstances act for both parties. Mr. Cotlor said an niter had been made for (he property for practically the consideration (lie plaintiff gave for it by a mnn who had grazed horses on it. but at this stage it was announced that the parlies had come to n settlement, and proceedings were discontinued.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120527.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1450, 27 May 1912, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
194JUDGE AND SOLICITOR. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1450, 27 May 1912, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.