FINGER-PRINT EVIDENCE.
$ IMPORTANT RULING. By Telesraph-Press JUsociation-Copyrislt. Sydney, May 21. Tho Chief Justice, in delivering the Federal High Court's decision, to refuse an appeal on a finger-print conviction, said that as signatures were accopted as evidence, finger-prints were really signatures. . ■This coincides with the view of the majority of tho Stato Full Courts.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120525.2.37
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1449, 25 May 1912, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
53FINGER-PRINT EVIDENCE. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1449, 25 May 1912, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in