Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAW REPORTS.

« COURT OF APPEAL. CROWN & THE LEVIN ESTATE. ANNUITY OF WIDOW. DECISION-IT CAN BE TAXED. Yesterday the Court of Appeal delivered judgment in tlio .action between Amy Levin, widow, of Netley Park, Gomshall, ■England (plaintiff) and the Now Zealand Commissioner for Taxes (defendant), 'f ho action arose on an originating summons to determino whether tho plaintiff is liable to bo assessed for income tax in respect of the annuity of ,£3OOO paid to her pursuant to'the will of W. H. Levin, deceased. The summons had been removed from on account of the importunce of the issue involved. V By his'will,'dated April' 22, 1391, the late. AV. H. Levin bequeathed all his estate .to his trustees until tho death of second marriage of his widow, making provision for a (dear annuity of to a relative, and lor J!8000 per annum to his widow, and the remainder to his four children. He died in 1893, and the trustees have since paid income tax upon the capital estate and upon revenue derived from lands and mortgages. In 1910 the Commissioner of Taxes demanded income tax for the first timo upon the annuity of ,£3OOO, and demanded it also for three years antecedent to 1910. It was paid under protest. In 1911 the sum of .£175 was demandas income tax upon the annuity, and again tho payment was made unde* protest. The trustees and the plaintiff (Mrs. Levin) contended that no income tax was payable by Mrs. Levin as recipient of income from the trust estate where the trust estate paid tax in full upon the properties from which such income was derived. On the other hand, the Commissioner of Taxes contended that an unregistered annuity, if and so far [is it was derived from or constitutes a charge upon the land or mortgages, was assessable for incomo tax. At the hearing, Mr. M. Myers (with him Mr. W. H. D. Bell) appeared for Mrs. Levin, and tho Solicitor-General. (Mr. .T. W. Salmond), for the Commissioner, of . Taxes. The answer of .the: Court of Appeal (as sot out in the. .judgments of tho Chief Justice, Mr. justice Edwards, and Mr. Justice Cooper), was in the affirmative. viz.: "The plaintiff is liable to be assessed in respect, of the unregistered annuity of ,£3OOO paid to her, pursuant to tho will of W. H. Levin, deceased." Judgment was therefore for tb.e defendant (the Commissioner of Taxes), with costs amounting to .£3O.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120523.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1447, 23 May 1912, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
406

LAW REPORTS. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1447, 23 May 1912, Page 3

LAW REPORTS. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1447, 23 May 1912, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert