Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MERELY BUTTER

RELATIVE HONESTY OF MEN. 11l tho letter published below a correspondent has touched upon a question over which there is a considerable divcrg; nnco of opinion—the greater honesty ol woman compared to men. Whether it can be satisfactorily demonstrated is a question over which one feels rather curious, for men, on. many recent occasions, have shown a limitless capacity for saying m a most unblushing fashion, tilings which they know and everyone else knows, are quite untrue. Why? Can any one tcllr However here is the letter:— "The little article on '.Merely Butter opens «p an interesting question to which I hope some of your readers may respond. Are women generally more loyal to their opinions and convictions than men? "I believo women aro real)' much more honest. Every day we have proof of men's, insincerity. Head their speeches at the various presentations to men v.;ho hare received promotion—probably, in their opinion, quite undeservedly—but, listen, as ono after the other gets up and makes a laudatory, fulsome speech about a man for whom, in their hearts, they have only contempt—'Merely Butter.' "How often rnca wil gilve as their reason for voting to put a, man into some prominent position—'Oh, Jones is not a bad sort, a bit tricky/ or 'not as straight as he might be.' "Again, if a man has been at however distant a period a schoolfellow, that is an all-sufficient reason ofr voting for him. Even though he is known to be all that is undesirable. "In my opinion no woman would yoto for any man for the same reasons; they would "want some better excuse than : 'Ho is not a bad sort, though a bit tricky.' For honesty of purpose give me "A WOMAN." SUPERFLUOUS HA IK. Superfluous hair destroyed by "Etisma" (reg.J. A guarantee given with each cute undertaken, See testimonials and letters. Mrs. Uullon (over 'Economic), Lambton Quay. 'Phone 1047. (Testimonial.) Caps Town, May 2Sth, 1011. Dear Mrs. Hullen,—Just a line to let you know that the Pan of "Rusina" I got is a complete success, and I no longer need to use it, though 1 keep it my mo. I have tried many cures, but so far this is the only one. I cannot express my pleasure in being able to write io vnu thus. "Uusma" did Aid. that you said it would. With heartiest good wishrs ior vour nuccm.—Tours vrrv sincerely. r. JOHNSTONE. Qrisina.l ccpy of gbev« ou b* it mj sMcw«, *

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120507.2.84.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1433, 7 May 1912, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
412

MERELY BUTTER Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1433, 7 May 1912, Page 9

MERELY BUTTER Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1433, 7 May 1912, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert