Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

(Before Mr. YV. Cl. Riddell, S.M.) THEFT AT RAILWAY STATION. A charge of having stolen a handkerchief containing two r.iilv.-av tickets and .-&) !)s. in nnr.ey (total value, J?3 lis. (id.) from Mrs. Annie YVhilemon, was made against L'lizahelh Stenuett, an elderly woman. The defendant, who was represented by Mr. I'. W. .fa.'kson, pleaded nut guilty." The prosecution brought witnesses to stale that Mrs. Whitman had into the waiting roam at tho i.ambton Station, and had left her money (tied in a handkerchief) on a table for a few minutes. Defend int. «t that time, was .-aid to be the iiulv poison in the wai tin,'-room, besides Mi-s.'Whik-maii's little gi'rl; and the little giH alleged that defendant had "touched" the parcels. Detective Cameron had been summoned, and had found three sovereigns anil some silver in the pussession of the defendant. .Mrs. Whileman staled that she had had Hires sovereigns and some silver in her .handkerchief. The defendant denied the charge, but the Court convicte.l her, and ordered her to make restitution, and to appear for scalene.; when called upon. UNDEIt PROVOCATION. Degin.ild Wright was charged with having behaved ill a threatening manner at ■lohnsDiivilh.' liiiilwiiv Station on March 'J. Wright, who plead'i-il not cuillv, ■ was represented l>v Mr. K. V. Willi-. Afl'-r hearing a deal of evidence, his War-hip said that Wright had received 'provocation, and, in the circumstances, had probably acted rea.-onably. lor there was testimony to the effect that Wright had been knocked under a railway carriage. Tlio infcriuafion was dismissed. SCHOOL ATTENDANCE, l-'or failing to .-end chihlre.i to school, guardians were lined as follow:—William lielshain, 25., and costs 75.; .Limes Hums, lis., and "s.; .1. (.Vile, !N.. and 75.-, .lohn .Maxwell. ":■., and 7>.; Frank Morion, 25., and "-.; Kituna \Vi'!,cs. .V., and 7-.; and Henry Wit hey, '.'.-., mid ".-. OTHER CASES. ,1,-ibe;-. Wiiolridgo was fined £1 for two breaches of his prohibition order. l-'or using bad language, Herbert Thompson and Edward May were each fined ,13.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120323.2.112.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1396, 23 March 1912, Page 15

Word count
Tapeke kupu
328

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1396, 23 March 1912, Page 15

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1396, 23 March 1912, Page 15

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert