Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A POINT IN STYLE.

A correspondent tlie other day (says an I English writer) askotl a discusMun of the whole "Question of St.vli , " us treated by Mr. Bennett in his liltlo'bonk on "Literary'■ Taste." Such a discussion trouid occupy too much space, but it is possible to touch upon three of the points involved which show the inadequacy of Mr. Bennett's conception of the matter. For one thing, tlin contejition with which llr. Bennett starts, that (lie idc-u can only rsist in words and only in on« form oi words, so that all "jiolisiiius up" of the idea, is sound in so far as it reminds us I'liiit style does not mean importing into expression beauties gathered ab extra, but tiio evocation of beauties nlready Intent in the idea; but it leaves out of account entirely the important clement of rhythm. A cultivator of numerous prose —and nil good prose is numerous—may supersede a word by a synonym in order to eliminate a cacophony or to secure an alliteration or an assonance, or he may invert the order of two classes lo the advantage of the rhythm, and thus, without nlterin? one jot or tittle of the meanln» polish up the style. Similarly, it is paradox to say thai "you cannot have good matter, with bad style." Iho sentonce in its lax form was perfectly intelligible, but it. was inferior as style, while it is a familiar experience for a reader to receive the suggestion, of a fine idea from an imperfect utterance. Finally, it Iβ possible to read an author for Ins ityle without Boon "pettin? sick of him. ' Jn Hint caw tho reader, of course, takes the matter into account, not. however, for liift own sakn, but for the sake of tho opportunity it (,'ives him of watching how bis author brings into play all the re-

sources of his craft in handling it. "How many books," says Stevenson, "do . wo continue to peruse and roiioruso with pleasure whose only merit is tlio eleganco of texture? i am tempted to mention Cicero'; and since Air. Anthony Trollopo is dead, 1 wiil. It is a poor diet for the mind, a very colourless and toothless 'criticism of life'; but wo enjoy tho pleasure of a most 'intricate and dexterous pattern, every stitch a model of elegance and of Rood senso; and the two oranges, oven if one of them bo rotten, kept dancing with inimitable grace." Indeed, in Stevenson's essay "On Soino Technical moments of Style," with its conception of style* as pattern-wearing in language, we get nearer to the secret of tho mutter than wo do in Mr. Bennett.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120309.2.97

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1384, 9 March 1912, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
441

A POINT IN STYLE. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1384, 9 March 1912, Page 9

A POINT IN STYLE. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1384, 9 March 1912, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert