Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUGAR COMMISSION.

- -NO PROFIT FOR -MERCHANTS. fly Telegraph—Press AE6ociation-Copyrlght Sydney, February 23. ■At tho Sugar Commission, a witness gave evidence that the Colonial and Malic|uin Companies always raised and lowored prices simultaneously. This suggested nn understanding. A number of wholesale merchants declared that they dealt largely in, the Colonial Company's sugar, and that the profit to them was practically nil. The sugar duty was generally condemned. In contradiction of a witness, the chairman declared that evidence given in North Queensland was to the effect that the country was suitable for nothing but sugar, rice, and cotton. Dairying, etc., tad been tried without success.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120224.2.47

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1372, 24 February 1912, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
103

SUGAR COMMISSION. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1372, 24 February 1912, Page 7

SUGAR COMMISSION. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1372, 24 February 1912, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert