Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MR. FOSTER. FRASER AND HIS CRITICS.

. Sir —In your issue of Tuesday last it is indeed gratifying to nolo that your comments on Mr. Poster . Eraser's endeavour to .vindicate the nttitiulo adopted m his book on Australia. provo conclusively to all sober-mindedly disposed individuals that.there is attaching to tho poiicy of- tho paper ari impartiality and broadmmdednoss wliioh in' these degenerate days is of sufficient importance to warrant more than passing notice. ' I' seems . qnito : clear that tho spirit of Mr. Frasor's remarks has been grossly misconstrued, otherwise there would not have, been the occasion, for tho controversy which now engages public. attention. It has been inferred that his remarks savour only of those likely to proceed from prejudiced minds; such, if ono rightly understands his individuality, ,is not tho case, and I-am sure it was not .to his aggrandisement or pecuniary gam to bo unfair. Tho shortcomings of Australia,, like those of other countries, are more glaring to: strangers than to its denizens.'. On,the other hand, tho tilings •that are praiseworthy and evoke approval arrest the attention more forcibly.of the stranger than of the .natives. .If it were possible that Mr. Fraser was unjust in stating certain failings alleged to attach to tho country and its people, could it not bo equally, possible that ho gave them credit for virtues., that were not their.due. In .the latter respect,. not a single .Australian has admitted of such a probability, nor is likely to. To have consulted the wishes of tho Australian people as to what they would have lilted to-be said about themselves in the book ■they loathe would have been a stratagem likely to have contributed to a better understanding between tlio author and the Commonwealth people, Apparently their idiosyncrasies suggest that this would ho the enso, nnd thus havo nreclnded the umbrageoitsnoss of. their feelings. Apologising for the call this makes on your space— I am, etc., ~ li, W. MILLAR, January 24.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19110128.2.4.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1037, 28 January 1911, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
324

MR. FOSTER. FRASER AND HIS CRITICS. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1037, 28 January 1911, Page 3

MR. FOSTER. FRASER AND HIS CRITICS. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1037, 28 January 1911, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert