RIVALRIES IN PERSIA.
ATTITUDE IN FRANCE. By Telegraph—Press Association—CoDrricht Paris, January 1". In the Chamber of Deputies, M. Jaures, the Socialist leader, blamed France'-' for assenting to the Anglo-Russian t Convention, the object of which he declared to be the partition of Persia.
JI. Pichon, Minister for Foreign Affairs, in reply; said no such object had ever teen in the negotiators' minds. | The agreement was calculated to terminate conflicting rivalries, which might have, led to the partition of Persia. It was, he added, one of the happiest agreements arranged for many atloug year.
lleplying to 11. Constant, who had made a statement regarding the Bagdad railway, SI. Pichon remarked that no foreign Power was entitled to grant railway concessions in Turkey. Possibly there had been' some conversation at Potsdam relating to the linking of the Bagdad rail-: way with a future northern Persian line. Why should France, in such a case, object to Germany's asking Russia, not to opposo the linking up of those lines?
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19110119.2.62
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1029, 19 January 1911, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
165RIVALRIES IN PERSIA. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1029, 19 January 1911, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in