Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLITICAL NOTES.

— ♦— . A QUESTION OF "FAIRNESS." During his reply yesterday to the criticism levelled at the Aid'te Water Power Works Bill in the Legislative Council, the Hon. Dr. Findlay took strong exception to 'certain remarks made in a sub-leader in The Dominion yesterday in regard to the speech delivered' by the Hon. C. M. Luke on Tuesday. In justification of , Mr. Luke, who could not reply, he said he hnwt say something about an article which he considered to be reckless, bitter, and unfair. The writer, who, had said that Mr.' Luke did not understand the meaning of a load factor, was either a very ignorant' or a. very stupid person, or an unfair critic.. If there was one speech delivered in tho Council on the linos of science, experience, thoroughness, and attention it was Mr. Luke's. He (Dr. Findlay) hoped that for the sake of journalism in this town, a little ■ more fairness would be exhibited in the future. . [Tho following is the passage in The Dominion's editorial that the AttorneyGeneral considers is not " fair :— "Tho Hon. C. M. Luke's attempt to traverse Mr. Jonkinson's able speech was a lamentable performance, and his figures were at times ludicrous, as one example will show. Mr. Jenkinson had claimed that the Prime Minister's estimate of the'cost per horse-power in the Coleridge scheme was too low, and Mr. Luko admitted that it was lower than Mr: Hay's. But, said Mr. Luke, Mr. Hay's estimate was based on a load factor of 100 per cent, (which, by the way, it was not, as such a load factor is physically impossible in actual practice). Mr. Luke added that with a probable load factor of 20 to 30 per cent, a proportionately small quantity of water and smaller outlay on headworks would be required. Mr. Luke evidently has not a notion, of. what 'load factor' means. He seems to think—(l) that the , higher the 'load factor' the higher the cost of production of a unit, and (2) that the smaller the plant the smaller the 'load factor.' As we have already explained, the higher the 'load factor' is the lower is the cost of produotion; while the 'load factor' has no relation to the size of a plant, any more than the ability of a man dopends ■upon his girth." The facts in'' this passage, of course, are undisputed.]

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19101103.2.91

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 964, 3 November 1910, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
394

POLITICAL NOTES. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 964, 3 November 1910, Page 8

POLITICAL NOTES. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 964, 3 November 1910, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert