Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GRIPPED GUILTY.

THE TRIAL ENDS. SENTENCE OF DEATH. THE ACCUSED SEVERELY CROSSEXAMINED. By Telegraph—Press Aesociation-Oopyi'ißht' .. London, Octobor 21. The trial of Crippen has concluded with a: verdict of guilty against tho prisoner, who was duly sentenced to death by tho presiding judgo, Lord Alverstono, Lord Chief Justice of England. ■ ■ The accused, Hawley Harvey Crippou, American dontist,, was charged with having murderod his wife, Cora Crippen, otherwise Belle Elmore, , or Belle Mackamotski, at 39 Hillrop Crescent, Camden, in February last. His companion, Ethel Le Neve, who is charged with having been- an • accessory after tho fact, is to be tried separately. '■- \ ■ Crippen, who elected to give evidence on his own behalf, again occupied tho witness' stand, He said that during' tho final quarrel.with liis wife he offered her money to :go away., -He admitted that he liad not inquired of cabmen and others regarding; his wifo's flight, and had not considered the. effect the announcement of death would cause his wife's.friends;. ; Under pressure he admitted,that portion of a pyjama suit found with the remains might possibly be part of a suit his Wife hadbought. •;■' '.-■• -Counsel remarked that the oli'rth of which:'the suit was made . had; been manufactured for the first time in November, 1908. / ■:'."'.'.■■ Crippen shook, his head as if unconvinced. ,\ ■ :''".''';: ■ his evidence,' Crippen said that,, as' far as 'he was aware, the cellar at ; the Hilldrop Crescent residence had not been disturbed during his tenancy. There: were times when his wife ..was absent,■" in which tho; remains might have been' placed in the cellar.' Ho. decided to leave England, fearing he would be : arrested and detained' until his wife-was found.. ; Dr. Turnbull, of tho - London HosI pital, : '.'testified, that theVmark on the skin of portion of thebody, found,-was not an operation scar, but caused by the folding of the skin after death.. The scarred skin was from the buttock, not the 1 abdomen.' ■•''•';..'..;',.. Dr. Wall, assistant physician at the London Hospital, said the scar was not ( an operation.scar.., ..'•'.: !' This closed .the case for the' defence. ■,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19101024.2.33

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 955, 24 October 1910, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
335

GRIPPED GUILTY. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 955, 24 October 1910, Page 7

GRIPPED GUILTY. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 955, 24 October 1910, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert