Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE DOCK.

RELEASE OF CONTRACTORS. POSITION DEFINED^ STORY OF THE NEGOTIATIONS. FURTHER STEPS TAKEN. New: light ; was shed , upon' the graving • dock question at the meeting of the Hut-. bour Board last night." The chairman : : ■ (Mr. E. Fletcher); outlined what- has '. taken piaco and gave reasons for the indefinite postponement, of tho undertak- . ing. Further steps in pursuance of tho .new. policy were-agreed to after an interesting discussion. Chairman's Statement. -■:-■■■ ' . .. ■ The chairman said hejfelfr. it to bo hia"- " :; duty, to; make, eomie ,remarks ;about',.the .' position the board was in with regard to . • the dock.. Her had gone into the matter - ;.: ,' : most carefully, and-would .outline; the ' ; history of the matter , and his views ae to ' ; .the course which the;aboard should now .: ; . : ; :'s;' ! pursue. He thanked the press for tho ; forbearance, shown .last^ or five months.. When he had completed the statement lie was about to make it " would bo readily realised that the matter .• was a delicate one and had had to treated: with . great.; care..' 'It was also)';. a ■ privato and confidential char- • actor, ; and. , .could not have ' boen -. disclosed without breach of trust. ;;> ■ ; obainnan, then; traced the' history ■''; of . .the dock projcct ; from April 1, 1897, . when-: the aboard, decided .: to : obtain a re--- - - port on the most suitable: site.: for: a dock and: the best typo to bo adopted; ' . . The Contract. , v Ho stated that - dredging" was completed • m 1906 at a cost of £16,378 os. lid., when tenders for" the . construction of tho doclc " >.. were .called, for.. Three tenders were ro- : ' •• •• ceivedFrom Messrs. J.- M'Lean and Son,for JG196,261 ss.- -Id.; Mr. C. F. Puller, 13s. ,10d;i Mr. Jamieson, ,£273,469, 12s. 9d. " Thev contract was let to;. ■:::: ' Messrs. ,J. M'Lean and Son in January, . : - . 1907, for the sum .of : £19G,261 ss. 4d.,.the . ,dato for completion being Dcoember 81, • '' 1910. The above price did not includfi ''' . :-- v jumping machinery, pen--'. '. ' stocks,; etc. The engineer's estimate was ijJKK 17s. Bd., and .ho (the chairman) ; *' believed he recommended the. board to : - accept a tender up to jC200,000. ::j ; The Concrete. No permanent work: was done in the years 1003-9, .tut part 'of. the staging" was ' erected and' plant' installed, and- it . was $ not until November, .1303, that..tho do- ~ position .of concrete - was commenced' and - v . ' -S:v' ; continued till November, -1909, when it was found; that, the concrete in the large \ . \ floor; sections was not setting satisfactor- V - 1 / : ily, and the work was .stopped, v The dif- . ficulty that arose was; ho understood,'.. '. '• largely , due to mechanical washing ,of .tho ' .-. • conorete when 'it from the ; -'i'-'K skips, the silt - in - all probability: : further"• accentuating the ; trouble. At all even'is it " was found difficult to - deposit . large qtian- -: * ' titles of concrete'in deep water and ob- -. '; ' .tarn "sound work, and it was. essential " . / that: this, portion of -the work should:-' bo' : > solid - beyond any . doubt. * .: Experiments ' - '. were made, to': by and find out the: ciluse' :: - : of the.;.trouble more .'or less .success.-' At.the same time had a quicker.deposi-.' ■ tion taken place and • more, up-to-date: ma-. • '.1.. chinery been " employed,' - better results - . '" might, have ensued. - Since ' November.—;-- '' - 1909, the work had been practically at ; standstill, S...<:y Contractors Asking for Concessions. >v;.v.. ; j. . "In April, 1910," confaniied • the chair* man,,-"tne,.contractors wore directed bv : tho, board to. proceed with: tho work. In- ' June, 1910, the contractors applied" for a :. seven; months' extension .of timo to en- . able them: to instal ..new plant .and ma- " chinery of 1 a type,', different -to that pro-. jvioiisly.; in use. The extension.'asked '• for'fvj was granted by the board on July 17,, , •. subject to certain conditions being' en- . : • tered into. • Those conditions wero not ' ; '. complied.:with by .the contractors.' On-:'; '-: -. : : . July 13-' the contractors ' -u-rofce ■ to j . .the;' ;;v \ board asking . for certain | - :;; .:; which -were refused.; Again, on August-'" • 5, the board was" approached, by letter :' : asking that tho contract be -' terminated, .: ; the contractors being, of 'opinion that thp- - \ w'ork oould not be carqed ont, and .that ' .'• the ' board pay -'half: the' c ontractors' esti-: ''";: 1 : mated loss of ' On 'Aiigust 2o thG.' i ':\ ' could: not accedo to tho request. ' Several Interviews. . "Several , interviews ' took, plaoe- between :■' Mr. M. M'Lean and myself,:'always' his^^•request,' r :inx which. herargued. that: it S ,'was\impossible' .to carry out. the work -m .: ' • tho manner prescribed, , and that the con-. ' . - -.• tract., should'"-'bev determined. aMia-;c6n^ : :-:;fy;"i----promiso arranged between the contractors'. : '. : and tho board. On each and'overy oeca— sion, both: privately and when' he inter- . •' viewed.tho board in, committee, I strenu- . • ously opposed'anj such compromise.; I';' could not: recognise .''any.:-money claim i ' . against-the board -or compensation of '..'.' any kind whatsoever for non-fulfilment' .. . of ..the- contract. I pointed out to Mr. ■ M. M'Lean that to my mind it was .. ." question of compensation frou. the^. contractors , to,; the • board ■ if the. con- ■ v/JSJs tract was determined. . • . ■ The Chairman's Attitude. " Tho attitude I have , taken up all through tho proceedings, although sur- ' rounded..with Mnsiderabie.:,difficulty,:has';V. ;; been in tho best interests of tho.board, ... - and :I trust' will- meet", withrthe-approval : of the-members.;: ! have maintained that ' . ' any.ideviation'''.or/ variation' of-: th©; tenns;:: ''":! of tho'contract.'or even the determination' ■' .. of- tho work must oome' from'.tho con- ' ' • tractors themselves, and must bo. uncon-.. ; . ditional. Further ' interviews . followed,, , . and on ' September:' 2: the' : icontractora"'.wrote to tho board abandoning the. con- . ' tr'aot;'.'" :/i J:- ' The Board's Recent Decision. "A special meeting of the board'was ""V-.. summoned to consider, this letter of aban- .'. . doiiment, and on September-.20 the board .-' -i' passed the. following resolution:—'While-. .. •. the board has been advised that-the contract entered into by the board and the .'; contractor is quite capable of perform- .- . . ance, tho board resolves that in view of ' • tho letter received from tho contractors, . •:. the boird mU > ''it..^e''hec^i7;'l^laHve't > authority be obtained'-freeing the board" ' •; "-. from all responsibility and liability, re- ;y ::J.'®S lease tlie" contractors and' their sureties;' -. • tho contractors making' no claim against -V S'.?i tho. board, such release to be immediately : . . entered into and hold until the necessary : : ■ • • .. legislation, is passed... S-'Si-M:;:;?, Total Expenditure. — . "The total expenditure on account of tho -; . '• dock to dato is .£32,957, made up as -fol-~- ' :lows:—^V: £ e d. Dredging 16,378 - 0 11 . :- Payments ,13,632 10 0 ■ :' . Other expenses, supervision, :.•;; ;:Js}? plans, etc 2,916 0 0 Total £32,957 0 To which has to : be added about £5902 : 'y for: contingent liabilities, making a total of .£38,557. and the. liability on the con« .. .". tract is The contractors' state ' . .:■ that their books shoiv a debit up to the- : . present of, in round figures, .foO.GOD. • '.- . Novel Method of Work. "I do not know that it is necessary for' - me to express any-opinion "as to whether it is "possible to carry • out tho work in: with: the conditions laid down, •: i e is -rather a matter for exports toy consider .and decide, but I may say that . • the method adopted is qnito. new A and novel. We have no experience to guide : , ' us, and it must be largely'speculative as ; i to .the. results, no work of: the kind being. carried out:: under similar conditions. . -. I'hat 'being so, one cannot help syinpa-. thising lvith tho contractors, who hav<lost a very, largo sum of money over the -. '~ transaction. I have my. own opinion on the; subject, and liave all".;along been" op- . ; -. ■ posed to the site at Clyde Quay, which" T.- -' ■ believe' to be tho most unsuifablo that could have been selected -in the whole •• ' harbour. -> Agreement Signed. "In ..terms of the resolution passed by : •' : : r " tho board on September 20 in regard to' :. ..'. releasing the -contractors: and ■' their':sure^ ties, they making no olaim against tl^e

/ ■' boaid, ; the/agreement has been duly on- ;:. . tered into and signed by/the parties cori- . corned, and .will bo hold pending legisla- /."/ tiori, the terms of which I trust the board will approve, and is herewith submitted:— - , "1. Postponement of tho work for / the -///./present/ '/-. "2. Malting the'/building of. the . dock ://.optional, instead of mandatory.. ."3., Vesting certain lands in the board.- .= / -/■ Setting, , free / for other works the balance of the unexpended: dock moneys now ■hold in that fund. /-" "5./ Provision ifor reserving and setting ./aside .£250,000 out of ,the-million loan'au- ' .thorised by the Act of 1908 for the con- (( /('.; itruotion of a' dock, when necessary. / What Might Have Been. "Under the "VWellington Harbour. Board "Act,.; 1902, Airiendmcnt Act; :%/ 1i)03,/the board was directed/to set aside I: /;. out of the total sum authorised to be bor- - . rowed; under the .1902 Act .£250,000, to be :'/.'■; placed to the credit of a- special account, •to : be called the 'dock fund account,' ,/ (- .whioh/sum was/to bei spent exclusively in /.,- 'the 'ycbnstruction/ -of/ a graving dock;, '(//Therefore,/presuming that.Messrs. ; M'Lean /(-' and'. Son had carried out their contract, the cost of tho dock, apart •: from'-work-■V,/ shops',: machinery; etc., would/be, close, on .V/f/i300,000. v -: Approximating 'the/total cost .//■with. the annual '.- charges would be:— / - / v :/> ) r ,( / Interest/ on .£350,000, ".at 4i ; per /•:/'• /(/(/ .Vcerit.' : per.aimum ; -■W,875 'f;; Sinking^Fund at .1. per cent, per annum '. 3,500 Depreciation.. ,£350,000, at 1. per' / y cent. per annum .../ 3,500. \ . Total at GJ per cent, per .-' / ' /■*(/;.,.. ..annum..-:.£21,875 - ■ To'.this .would proljably have' tO'be added ' /Z? th& loss on working, which, at a low esti-' ' , mate,; would -be a further per an•"'num. ; The board would'theri'ibe" I ,called, Z upon'to find,from J;20,000 to per annum with, the' dock' complete/ and ' in ■:.;/ ; working order. : //(/:'/.((/;/' :;li(i/.-, / - //'//'/■, 1 An Emphatic "No."' ■/// /"' : '^he'question ii"theni port af-. V:l ford-at the 'present .time .to carry, such a ; ■/.' burden 'as' I have/depicted? -In niy; °P:,nioii,: I /say emphatically, 'No,' and .while. : /"I'quite/.agrM; that .a doek' ; is/a .necessary^ ; ;if:./ adjunct :■ to awell-equipped/port,;io/build/ . a. dock at the •• present time/.wo.iud; ba to /. //'crush /the ./port ; /and . retard 'its [progress, ' )e g'//.well;-to. "seriously/consider /the/whole -quesr '■ tloii - and -tho -. advisability -. : of .. a >/: postponement / of i the , 'work,, : and / thereby , .rectify, what must surely , now /frecognised as ;a work' both costly, fi'-'travagant,, and /beyond the<ineans of ~tho v/:.V board. / / Let . us take last: year s opera- - " tions./ .'There was --a -ismall-. loss, .which /'had to be met by. aniincTeasiß of/chaigesi' >/rr-Theteit/surely;.:follows;H;hat'the .7 amount : -/ : ; 'Teqiiircd ; to meet the charges I - have quoted can only be -found iby/ stiU fur- -/,- ther -' increasing ; the ./dues on consignees '/" /.goods and • shipping tirid would be detri- //;■ mental/to/ every /interest, , fhe iboard not /,.,:; having, any rating /.area / or; /endowments. Against Higher Charges. : /:>'^^iiis : /;harhcuriof/,;ours'^ becomo' a great commercial and shipping centre, not a'.ono from its .vast' expanse '' of .water,;but from its/ gebgraphiciil situa- - ition, for nature - intended it to be one , ,',of .'tho finest harbours , iu the Southern //iiHemisphere;" ought,/ as/ the; ■;/ ; eentativ'es of ; ;tho/' people's / trust, • to bo /./ •careful' in; our administratiori ,of '.'their' /T:Wifaire./;.Thei : ] present; gen-;-";,v- ,-eraUy/ considered/"as/high; as/they should': / /and/ any further increase must, mili-; /.Z/|tate yfery//inaterially./against/. the reputa-; '■/ tion/ and , advancement of the. port' and ' city." ' - The Chairman's Motio'n. 1 In' conclusion;--tho' chairman .'moved: fc? /That the .prppo'sed.. legislation- ; re-// /'i •/• jard" to' .the gravi rig /dock, .as' set forth . : - .in the draft Bill. submitted by the :i&.'/;ioard's-. : solicitors,-\"be/ :^'appfoved/by;/the/.. ''S;///VoMd/arid./forwarded. .to./the//-Prime/.,; .' Minister, arid that ho bo asked to • :i^6tV'the;ibqa^d;.iin./'obtairiing 'during • • -i//?/:'ihe/prtMnt/session' -the/'legislation'dri- A :////sited// ; Z >/«//A : /Z W /,/.;: '.' . .'). - ', - /:"•/ . ■ , -V *'' A Point of Order. ; ■//£/giv^/'^:-. ; /'?,';//V Zc J ' ! '• "//';.:;//// '/'f '/' /'.'. 'The point ofV order';.WM •disallowed/ byithe chairman. 'A Word for the Contractors. /../'/ ■Mr. Mi/Cohen seconded the motiou. Ho ' said /he'; had from tho outset been a strong /opponent of. the. dock- project. Tho / /public would /now- l r'ealisß ; that tho board / Shad been .'.right in. keeping very; close :'' J :;!ieomt 'raising ;:fof/ pdrt;-. : cliargfes'' - to : tHe/ 'Teinarked ; /'i'/rof/fithei/same/ kind . /would/ .'follow,- ; ifthe! . . .work were, still to -go';on. : He thought , wis... on - the /wrong 'site. The lioard would have •tho opportunity, later/of. purchasing tho • - Patent-Slip,Zand, that would ' be the i ■1} proper/ place; for/ a -graying dock, '/if one v requiredi / He ,was satisfied- that the hardship arid • their' request to . bo' relieved of'the con-/-toact'iVasduealtogetherfco-tliat- circum/' / etance. ' •■ Ho thought, the board should ; -jiot go to the ' bitterest end and claim , tho i^VMiate®idlilrft ; '''by^the?coritractord'./''6ii/ : the; -' . jground, as'proposed.' The material would' '. ibe. of.rio present u<x> to the board,' but. ;/Z/)might be : useful:.'to:'. coritractore; //.The: ///"jpubliij/had;-pound : for/satisfaction in bejj;: ungrid -of an. incubus. • ' . An Objector. /z 2 Mr. . P. 'G.z Bolton said he. considered . //thiat sb;'imj)ortant"a/inatter .re.quired'more'- //■! deliberation 'than/it had;received;;- .'.lt-; /. ' (been, rushed. /Neither-he, rior/as far as ■ •ho knew, any other'member of-the board r !had / had / 'rio'tice that the : question; . ~ -would come- up at' that meeting, until . that evening's paper came out. Apart ~ from the point- of order, the;motion'pro-: ..'posed- was one of,such, a nature that : /. members /should/have ■ had / full' notice of j itrv/ .He/ considered;'that the chairman's", statenient-that the'trouble at tho Works • '-was/iricreased; by' :silt was ill/advised,.:and • s io-did not agree with it. It'was un-,;/"'j-wise';to:?say - 6\ich'Va thing/ while/the/matv .Her /was still sub judice. . :/v /;:•:■ >. / :. The chairman: I'm prepared ; to - take / "the responsibility. // // ;';/ /.- /, Mr. ; Bolton went on to reiterato liis dis- ./'. Bent, from the resolution, passed, at the' ;./'; iast/i'-mefifirig;'.,to /contractors;/ . •. The board:had;gone the wrong way about ;-;//jit.-'//Befdre; deciding./whetherto; release'/ ■ : .,/ ; ;!thei'coritractors",or/not,, the '.board should • 'iave decided whether they .wanted tho // Vrfock.-/or/not.//They/ had ..not'/faced'' that. ; ';Z -iquMtioni - / The/ position of the / sureties—: (KHwo:/ substantial' geritlemeri at'^BlOiOOO: ' eachhad n'ot.-.beeri/fully ; cphsi4ered. In TOr ; v; / ileasing. the .contractors,/the'Vboard/, had, /. /practically decided /.against;; /having 'a dock. . /-■ </// /:'/' Jlr. Tewsley: No. ' : ■ */ ////Mr.; Bolton :/ Then we/ are riot doirig-: our. duty .as trustees, for - tho public. He had ,liimsell zMmewhat ;of /an iopen mind on : : : question,- and I ho would liavo liked: to 1 fall/the expert/ evidence, -that Oould ; .'have been got. ... ... .' /' The Concrete Difficulty. ' -It .wasznot .proved /that the. method of /: - coristructiori emplpyed/' was impracticable. . ' -'/A dock 'had . been laid down in the Detroit River,-;-Wft. under; water/ (instead / . of .40 at ...Te.. Aro),' and - quite' 'successfully. The difference between fresh'" and/ salt, water did not: matter'. ,"/-,' ,■ '/ // . ' ' The; chairman../ Messrs- ■ M'Lean/' .were / . "using jiist the same/method a few' months ago. Mr.'/Bolton. qaoted nuriierous; details as' '.?.->;-W-what'';yis.z,doii« ; i Jn'-'thei-ilteJ6reit;-BlTer,'- / /: and ; . said - he did: riot- believe . that the, same methods',-we.ro/emplbyed' hero. Thoso who v ;condemned, the (lock/policy on / tho r'ty expeHence . of other :ports did not mako '• ' ';/-allowances for, natural differences .and the (/-'-.-/.-possibilities: of. the future.; There were three parties 1 who "had .not been. ; fairly considered in'this matter—(l) tho general i public of /Wellington,:who always under- : .//stood/that a/dock.was to be erected; (2) -. the people whose lands in- Grainger . '/. Street were taken for! "a public purpose"; and '(3) .the Harbour Board lessees, who had been induced to take up land in the / vicinity by/the prospect of the dock. He was one of the latter, but it happened that his land would'be more valuable /without the dock, The. board would lose all thei money it: had spent. .Ho.supposed the hole would be filled up, 'and what had been done would be of doubtful / value to the /board. . Tho plant, /which Mr. Cohen wished the 'board to abandon ,- to the contractors, was valuable,"and included electric motors, derricks, and valuable piles. Tho article about. the ■ Detroit deck,' which he -had already . quoted from a technical journal, had

I been .shown by liim to somo of tho largest firms dealing with-concrete, and they.had agreed that it throw a'new light on the subject, ami showed that/tho method of construction was practicable. He also referred to expert evidence in favour of the site. He was strongly against tho motion. : Not "Rushed," • Mr. C. W. Jones protested against Mr. Bolton's statement that the question had been rushed. It had been moro carefully considered than any ■ other/subject that had been before the board whilo he hod been a .member.' He supported tho motion. '-. ■ ' Mr. J. W. M'Bwan also supported the motion./,Ho .thought"/all.i,the members, except Mr.. Bolton, who had stated, the contrary, knew 1 that the- subject would come up that night. / The board would be : justified, ; from every possible, point of .Wow, in postponing tho building, of a 1 dock. /; ' 1 ' ' ' /•Mr: 'J; G. Harkness said , ho- had \long desired, the aboard .to . take/ the- step it was now taking. It: was conferring a boon ,on the community. Ex-Chairman's Views. , , Mr. T. 51. Wilford, M.P., said, that, during: 'his > two years'- chairmanship," no question gave him so muolr concern as the statutory .'obligation to ; construct a dock .which he. and ; the members " saw, would entail standing charges. The question; as it' appealed to them at the time was- how to '-abandon'/the 'work■'■.without approaching tho contractors. To go to the contractors Would/have weakened the. board's position, and; the board therefore stood . firm upon (,the engineer's'/report. When the "laitanco" trouble, arose, theboard, rather;.- reluctantly allowed, a sus-' pension. •/ One result of. the present policy l would be that\that-: suspension, 'would have cost the, board nothing. Mr. Fletcher was now able to carry' out what lie. (Mr. "Wilford)/' woiiM have .liked to do, and, he .' was /doing/it in; a: manner .that rejected . credit upoii-rliim; ; He { regretted the loss . to. Messrs,'/ M'Lean 'and Sons. -.Probably 1 .£30,000; would not cover it; but the board had to mako the best bargain it/ could -for the ,/ public. The / money, set -aside : for the . dock' had been earmarked for , tlie/purpose, and it was "a .proper' arrangement,' as proposed ; ih/the ' Bill, ithat. that /money,.: which' had' :been : raised.' on; excellent/ terms,. should -be - devoted' to other.' necessary.; purposes,/and the board / should; be / allowed to ' dsjoto,, ■^250,000/of/the//loan'/moneys-authorised; by; Parliament, but :-not yet" raised,/to the/construction/of za\dock, if "such' were, decided upon'at-some future'time. >'i Chairman's Motion Carried. • ' Tho chairman,' replying to Mr. Bolton, said .that, the/'present'/ board 1 had,' not'' had to consider .whether a dock should ; .'l^''' l /cpißtrt'cte'd//V;'The.:;'jqiiesti6n:.<that'^hiwl i and"-'decided-',■.■was'--', thatof postponing the work.! He /realised .tho: value, of a dock' to .a/ port, "but if tho Wden/would; .'as .;'he held; 'cripplethe board and tho port, it was/ undoubtedly wise to 'postpone it. • ;■ . -■/;//'/' . Tho motion was carried, Mr. Bolton dissenting. -. //'•:/ ■' //.'./:■'./ ->"/"/ ;■ / : ' ■■/;', ■/..'/

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100929.2.59

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 934, 29 September 1910, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
2,915

THE DOCK. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 934, 29 September 1910, Page 5

THE DOCK. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 934, 29 September 1910, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert