Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHY?

I EMINENT SERVICES OVEH--1 LOOKED. j Both the "Otago Daily Times" and , Christchurch "Press," in commenting i on tho birthday honours just an- • nounced, remark on tho failure to rej cognise the services of Mr. Justice , Williams. r The "Otago Daily Times," in. the J course* of its article, says: —"We par- > ticularly dqsire, however, at this time ■ to express regret that once more the i eminent services that have been ron- ' dered the Dominion by a respected member of tho judiciary have escaped recognition at the hands of the Crown. 1 Not only is Mr. Justico Williams, in '' point of service, by far tho oldest judge ' in the Australasian Dominions, but he ' is, wo believe, actually the doyen of ' the judges throughout the whole of the ' British Empire. For more than thirty- ' five years he has with dignity and distinction filled a place on the Bench of the Supreme Court, and the ability with, which no has discharged the duties of i his responsible and honourable office is I recognised, far and wide, by those • skilled in the interpretation of the law. . To those who are unable to assign a ■ , cause for tho continued absence of his \ name from tho list of recipients of Royal favours it is a surprise that, \ while judges in other countries with far'shorter terras of service have had knighthoods conferred upon them, he should have been apparently over- ' looked. But by those who believe they, • can assign a cause for what they re- > gard as a deliberate slight upon an ; eminent jurist the omission of his name t from tho lists of honours is described ■ in harsh terms. If. it be the case that i the private feelings of any colonial personage are allowed to influence the disposal by the Sovereign of the marks of his Royal favour the circumstance is ( one that must bo regarded with pro- . found regret." '•■ The "Press" says:—"We have again . to regret that Mr. Justice Williams'e kmg and valnable services as a puisne judge havo not yet been recognised by ' the knighthood that in other colonies 1 has been conferred upon men immeasurably his inferior. Not only has he sat on tho Supreme Court Bench.for a ■ far longer period than any otilqr judge ■ in Australasia—a full generation has passed since he was appointed—buthe is also, by consent of tho legal profession, admitted to be one of the most \ able jurists in the Empire. It is unfortunate that the New Zealand Gevemmeiit should so persistently overlook a distingaished colonist whose claim to--1 official- recognition would have beer, admitted long ago in any other part of' ' the Dominions."

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100627.2.30

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 853, 27 June 1910, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
438

WHY? Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 853, 27 June 1910, Page 6

WHY? Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 853, 27 June 1910, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert