Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

The question -whether < a sheep-dog which had chased and caught rabbits wasentitled to license exemption camo boforo the Divisional Court oil an appeal from adecision by certain Devonshire- justices. The dog in question had caught a num-' ber of rabbits in the harvest field in the owner's presence, but as the owner didnot himself urge the dog on the justices had dismissed an information preferred' against him of using the dog for sporting. purposes. The Lord Chief Justice, in dismissing the.-appeal, said it was not suggested that in ordinary circumstances the dog was not used solely for tending sheep and c&ttle. But if in any other; case it was found that the owner hack used, the dog for catching rabbits ho (the-, judge) would come to a very different' conclusion. '

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100608.2.103

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 837, 8 June 1910, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
130

Untitled Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 837, 8 June 1910, Page 7

Untitled Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 837, 8 June 1910, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert