THE EMIGRANT CHILD,
NOT FOE, THE BACKBLOCKS." By Telegraph-Press Asßociation-Cqpyrieht, London, April i. Mr. T. A. Coghlan' for New South AVales), writing to "The Times," says: "Some Australian employers m tho bapkblqcks are- averse to married couples with children, not because they are heartless or unfeeling, but because they prefer the children to remain, in the thicklyrpopulated areas, where they are able to obtain doctors, nursing, and schooling. "The controversy has arisen because certain emigration committees in England are sending unemployed mechanics and labourers with families. This is entirely contrary.to the State Govern-1 incuts' -policy. The States expect a man to, send for his 'family when hehas' established himself.'.' ■' ' , .
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100406.2.37
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 784, 6 April 1910, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
109THE EMIGRANT CHILD, Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 784, 6 April 1910, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in