When tho Budget was introduced, it was claimed bj- tho Opposition that it ■ was an example' of tho admittedly unconstitutional' practice;, of "tackiiig," . against which-the; LbrdsJ right of-veto had never been dropped, and had indeed" boon''.' expressly recognised by statesmen of both parties. It was realised that if it -we're allowed to pass without protest it would create a precedent enabling al- - most'nil kinds of proposals to be carried. 1 under cover of the annual Finance Bill.. Much opposition was also aroused by tho. various-provisions of the Bill which had lons been part of the Collectivist propa--ganda, and wero widely welcomed ■by ro- . prescntative' Socialists as an -instalment of tho realisation of their'ideals. Tha prorogation.. finds each party, to all appearance, more firmly convinced than evei. of the justice nnd constitutional validity v of its cause, and resolved on making ait* impassioned and confident appeal to the judgment of the nation.—"Tho Times."
/:: J : BBTTKR. '■ FINEST FIRST-GRADE FACTOKY, CHAMPION'BRAND,-. ONE SHILLIXfJ- PER POUND. Coupons Given Away with. Every Cash Purchase. f farde!l's, Willis' Street'
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100311.2.102.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 763, 11 March 1910, Page 9
Word count
Tapeke kupu
173Page 9 Advertisements Column 3 Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 763, 11 March 1910, Page 9
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in