Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LORDS' VETO.

WHAT will happen?

DIVIDED COUNSELS.

MENDERS, BENDERS,'AND ENDERS By Telegraph—Preßß Association—Copyright.

(Eec. February C, 6 p.m.) London,- February 5. The newspapers reveal sharp differences of opinion in the ranks of the Liberals concerning: the tactics to bo adopted regarding the House of Lords.

. The "Daily Chropiole" (Liberal), in a two-column leading . article, urges the ■folly of sectional i divisions , and . personal rivalries,, and shows that Mr.. Asquith, on Decembor;2, stated that'the first act of the now Government would be to reimpose , the Budget. The "Chronicle" adds;

"No other legislation, except insurance against . unemployment,: should ■ be attempted until'the House of Lords' veto, has been abolished. -The oreation of hundreds of hereditary peers would be dis-' tasteful'to democrats.

"The strategic danger in of the Liberals submitting -a soheme which is capable of being . .represented as virtual abolition of the House of Lords. Mr. Balfour,, Leader of the . Oppu>j tion,. will then submit a scheme for a -reformed Chamber, and.tho choice of-the doctors' will be doubtful."

.V'.TheTimes" .maintains that if- Mr. Asqmth- contemplated an heroic step, he should have gone. to the King directly the result of the election' was known. Nevertheless, the timo has arrived for a real change .in tho-Second Chamber, and a basis for deliberation exists in the report of Lord Rosebery's' Committee of Peers.

.. The/Xabour Leader," a new paper, says that Labour members : are' : opposed to the reform of the House of Lords, and demand its abolition.. :. • ■

' ■ VETO OB BUDGET FIRST P London, February 4.-> Discussing the .■■ political situation, the Liberal papers, /'Manchester Guardian," "Daily News/' ■ Nottingham "Express," and- Yorkshire ."Observer,"■■ demand that ,the Government should deal with the Lords before, re-introducing the Budget. . . The; "Daily, Chronicle" , (quoted in the foregoing : message) . dissents from this view. IRISH PART OF THE BUDGET. ■ NO. HALF-MEASURES ABOUT MR 1 O'BRIEN. "RE-CONSTRUCTION FROM TOP TO , , BOTTOM.' 1 . CRoc. February 6, 5 p.m.) London, Februaiy B. , Mr. : Wm.. O'Brien, chief of.the : Independent Nationalists., ; (elevon of whom' figure among the Nationalist total of 82), says,, that the Nationalists will require the Irish part of the Budget to be recobstructed from top to bottom.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100207.2.24

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 735, 7 February 1910, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
350

LORDS' VETO. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 735, 7 February 1910, Page 5

LORDS' VETO. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 735, 7 February 1910, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert