Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ONE FARTHING FINE.

INSPECTOR'S ACTION; CONDEMNED. :\'ln: ■■' tlie "', Magistrate's :;Court Vat. Tauniarunui;- last ■;Tu«sday,:..Mr..' :: l l '. , ; O'B; louglinan, S.M.,';.' presiding,- .the:■.'lnspector-, of; Awards proceeded:, against -W./H. Wackrow, manager'.'! of■'the Taringauiutu. ■Totara Sawmills Conipanjy Limited; 'for a penalty .for. broach of the.North- Auckland- timber workers' award by paying the wages-of mill, employees monthly instead of fortnightly.' '; : :\., '■■■ :: .....■ v '.-;.;■;. Mr. Tristrom defended, and'-the case aroused a- good deal of •■; interest." "The evidence' for the/: defence- was..-.-to I; the effect that' the:.'men.-:'had -'been ■.'offered their .wages fortnightly;. but had nnanimously -oeoided' that monthly: 'payments suited thoni better, and-had refused, to accept fortnightly payments. The mill is situ-: afed. fourteen ..miles : from .Taringamutu, and. to deposit, their .wages' in a bank or to;settle their accounts involved a lpsV of two days to the men'aftertach payday.v. The men, sixty, in: number, sent a , representative', to the. Court . to ; ; give evidence on their.behalf, and, in,a concise ; statement, ■ Mr. Page, representiiig the men,:assured■ the.magistrate.:that if. the award .was obeyed, great loss ■ and inconvenience would be suffered by: the mill'employees.-. ,' . : .: : . -.-.. .. -~: .•The magistrate spoke heatedly on the matter, and characterised' the inspector's action as a monstrous one, ; which 1 should never: have been brought-. ;ta 'waste thetime of the.Court.'-, .The action .appeared, to have, been brought : : for the purpose' of harassing' all parties ■ conoerned, and it was against the spirit of the Act that parties to awards should Ire penalised for i carrying out arrangements: which benefited the men particularly, ami that, he trusted : the inspector would not- again bring another-such casel before Miiiu. :.-'■■ , ; There beingV;?" technical breach,: the ;S.M.'gave. judgment, for, a- penalty of one farthing,"(without costs.—"Waikato Ar-, 'Rβ*.**-:' , ---:".'" , -" ;; ■ - : -:.-■.■■'::. ---r-i .'■■.■!',-,:■ ■:,■:

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100122.2.87

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 722, 22 January 1910, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
271

ONE FARTHING FINE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 722, 22 January 1910, Page 10

ONE FARTHING FINE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 722, 22 January 1910, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert