COUNCILLORS MUST VOTE.
THE STANDING OKDEES SAY SO.: i^f tt f i^??s, oeme ?, t: ' of last night's meeting of the City Council, the -Mayor '(Dr. Newman) referred to a difference of opinion which naa arisen at the previous meeting. The position, in a word, was that, when a question w ¥j•■before, the.council,. Councillor Hindmarsh \S\H r,V e£ns . e to vote/' - aid-'Hie 1 Mayor-re-plied,; You .must .vote." A.definite ruling had not.been given.on'the point, as, the, Mayor pro- "™ 4?' lo6k int ° position' thoroughly. ■ "■■.J-.V'Mayor-.n6w : romarted-that he" had con-' e!l e h 6h 6 ipattM/.0id,.. according to Rule 73 °-. •%, - S 'Q rders > every councillor must voce..(ilie section reads: "Every member preBentl, when, the question.is put, and'not interested therein, ■must'vote j oth.er.wiso he "shall'be held guilty, of contempt.' If ho has not heard the question put, the Mayor will again state it to liim"] . • ... ..... ,; if' 'a? 3 , ™P° rt ant to note,', however, that when Melrose had been amalgamated with tho city the Standing Orders had not been properly confirmed. Thcy' : were, therefore, invalid., He intended to refer them to the Bylaws Committee, and would ask the council to validate them. He had no further jurisdiction in tho matter, but ho considered that any ■ councillor, who' might not..fall in with his ruling in tho meantime would be lacking in courtesy. While the matter was before the By-laws • Committee, he trusted, that councillors would uphold his ruling. Since he had taken tho Mayoral chair, ho had endeavoured to rubVesactly in accordance with,the Standing Orders,; showing, no'favour...to one councillor more than to another. If the Standing Orders were not to he ..observed, the council would lose in honour and'.dignity of position. He '.hoped -to see the oversight rectified,Varid the .Standing'.Orders-observed. »;•■'.■ ■'Councillor ■Hindmarsh explained that ho .had meant- jno disrespect ..in declining to'' .vote: Things Tiad been confused at the time,'and he had not intended to dispute tho ruling or discretion of the Mayor. ■ >■■ ' ■ Tho Mayor said that he.was glad to have this explanation,. and to know, that councillors supported him in his rulings.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091217.2.63
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 692, 17 December 1909, Page 8
Word count
Tapeke kupu
337COUNCILLORS MUST VOTE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 692, 17 December 1909, Page 8
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.