Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ACTION FOR LIBEL.

THE LJV\V OP COMMENT. . ; ; (By : Telet;rnph--rrcsa Association.) *-■ ~ s i'.-vr*',Chrlstchupch, 'Novotnbor 26,; - .'Robert Grantham Money,.ac one timo editor %v.pf;:tn(j AL r.^iiariiete, •/v proprietor Vof :• the'-paper,.fori; JJIOD foi 4 - libel vj.•published-in• th<*j ouriid-i T aftdr;;a;civil case, in; ;V/'tfhi6fc^Monoy :: '.w jiour s v ' In- 1 evidence ;it 'wad staled that'tho, ariiclo complained of was -written by Mr. , •• Mitcholl, editor of .y *J ustico vDennistoa;': in- giving"" judgment • . for. said his first'impression ot the case i v - htifl :been' that' i| iwasi only 'question of. "how — irtufchP" and he -had .not .wavered ivom that I v vioW.;by anythiii£,.he had heard. .It >was quite > /•; impossible that, ov-'iury could. come ' i ('• t^any^thercoacl^ipn^Hero- ; \ras:. a' journalist: . whoiftad been drivon' into va Court' of justice ; l^g a l frights and,;ho,.::obtained - therii.lv The; least; that v could''haro ' bccn. : done' Vy :for;' the J others .fto.Vhold.; their ; about ''if, Obnt: occurred'V^to'anothor •4; journalist-.that plaintiff was a good-subject as if; the ;inan V :was-,being;: paid > off /tor-having, asserted his' . .rigllts:. His assertion of his legal rights was : v . inttdoKi.the.i ground -of •..-an'.:article which' -the •i; ailtn6r v 'admittedwas.-not compliiuentaryj and ■ irhich;•might injure plaintiff in'his profession. •• H6;,(his Honour) had seldom como across a aoJo unjustifiablo publication..- \ ,Why could they not let this young• man alone?' Tho only ;.:T;vi#(;;hB; i could;take:pf .it ;iyas l that vras ivil- • • fnllyjntcnded and calculated to damago plaintilj.'i It. \ras an ab?olutely gratuitous and un> ■ called-for - attack. The- dofence scetnod to 'bo founded on an . absolute 1 . Inisconception 'of -the ir: laiy;.,of.comment,.. 'fhat.law. wa3 that ft-public tho capacitj' of a critic, politician, or •v« jiidgV or 'other, capacity,'was subject to Vrislt , of :! h?iTihg his action's.commented upon with' the greatost - severity, - even:, frith the Kreatest Inr' jnstico and incorrcctness. "'Surely that did not apply in this case. i

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091129.2.65

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 676, 29 November 1909, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
292

ACTION FOR LIBEL. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 676, 29 November 1909, Page 9

ACTION FOR LIBEL. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 676, 29 November 1909, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert