LAWN TENNIS
RESULTS'OF SATURDAY'S MATCHES. Tiio following aTe tlio results of tlic lawn i tennis 'matches played ou Saturday i— I SHIELD. | • Wellington A. won against Newtown by 14 j rubbers .to 3 rubbers, 29 sets to 7 sets, 197 j fames to 121 games. The Wellington players are. mentioned first:— Brown v. Nagle, 6—2, 6—3; Blair v. Lindsay, { 6—2, CH); 'Salmond v. Redward, 6—2, 6—4; : Wilson'.v.,Jcfiery,- .6—2, C—3; I'raser v. Lewis, . 6—l; C—s; Ward v. Brailsford, 6—3, G—s; Brown and Blair r. Nagle and Lindsay, 6—l, 6—3;' Salmond and Wilson v. Kcdward and Brailsford, 6—3, 6—3; I'raser and Ward v. Jpffery. and Lewis, 5—G, 'J-—G; Miss Travers v. Mrs. Nagle, G—o, 6—l; Miss Cock v. Mrs. Grady, 6—3,. G—l; Miss Dimant v. Miss Robinson, ■ fj—i, 6—i;- MiSS Hannah v. Miss Penny, i—G, s—6;.Miss I'rancis v. Miss Dempsey, I—G, 3—6; Miss.Newman v. Miss,Webb, 6 —3, G—l: Misses Travers and Francis v. Mrs. Nagle and Miss Robinson, I—6, 6—4; Misses Cock and Dimant v. Mrs'.' Grady aiid Miss Dempsey, 6—3, '6—5;. Misses Hannah and - Newman v. Misses Penny, and. Webb, 6-r3, 6—2. 1 Thorndon won against Victoria College by 12 rubbers to 5 rubbers, 27 sets to 13 6ets, 194 games t0.148 games (one rubber halved). The Thorndon-players are mentioned first:— Swanston v. Prouse, 6—2, 5—6, 6—5; ■ Toung v. Weir, 6—5, 5—6, 6—l; Smythe v. Beere, 6—2, I 6—3; Putnam v. Smith, 1—6, ; 4—6; Mackay v. j Cleghorn, ' I—6, 6—2, 2—6; Cachemaille v. Taylor, 2—6, 2—8; ; Swanston and. Young v. Prouse arid Weir, 5—6, 6—l, I—6; Smythe and Putnam v. Beere and Smith, G—s, 6—2; Mackay and Cachemaille v.. Cleghorn and Taylor, 2—6, 6—l, I—6; Miss Nunnelly v. Miss Van Stavereh, 6—2, G—3; Miss Batham v. Miss Scott,< G—l, ; G—o; Mrs. Holmes v. Miss Roberts, 6—3,-6—2;. Miss Marchant v. Miss Tennent, G—4, &—1; Bliss Sniythe v. Miss Saxon, G—J, G—2; Miss Turtori v. Miss M'Kellar, .6—3,. 6—4; Misses Nunnelly'and Marchant v. Misses Van Staveren and Roberts, 6—o, 6—l; Miss Batham and Mrs. Holmes v. Misses Scott and Tennent, 6—5, 6—l; •Misses Smythe and Turton v. Misses ; Saxon , and M'Kellar, G—3, 2-C. " Brougham Hill won against Wellington B by 16 rubbers to 2 rubbers, 33 sets to 5 sets, 219 games to 110 games. The Brougham' Hill players are mentioned <first:— Hawkins v. A. M'Lcan, G—2, C —s; Hunter v. Jl'Nicol, 6—5, G—i; Quinnell v. Sheppard, G—2, 6—3; 11. V. Howe v. Clarke; G—o, G—2; Watkins ; v. Patterson 6—4, 5—6, 6—4; J. A. B. Howe, v. Eller, G—o, G—3; Huntef and Quinnell v. ii' Lean and Nicol,' 6—2,- 6—5; Hawkins and 1 J. A. B. Howe v. Sheppard and Patterson, 6—5, 5—6, 6—6; H. V. Howe, and Watkiiis v. Clarke and Eller, 3—G, 3—G; Miss Archer v. Miss Webb, 6—l, 6—o; Mrs. W. Howe v. Miss Duncan,, 6—2, 6—l; Miss Davis v. Miss Smallbone, G—2, ,G—s; Miss Morgan v. Miss Evans, - 6-4, (M); Miss Hogg v. Miss ' Kirker, 6—i, 6—5; Miss Williams v. Mrs. Brown, 6—l, 6—o; Airs. llowc and Miss Morgan v. Misses Webb, and Duncan, 6—5, 6—2; Misses Archer and Davis v. Misses Smallbone and Evans, 6—2, G—l; Misses Hogg and Williams v, Miss'Kirkor and Mrs. Brown, 6—l, G—l. CUP. . Hutt. won against Bidwill Street by 15 , rubbers to nil, 30 sets to 2, 189 .games, to • . 68 games.: The Hutt' players, are mentioned first Jackson v. Hamilton, '6—o, '6—o;'-Green v. O. .Pavitt, 67-4, G—3; Clere v. Swinburne, 6—3, 8—1; Callender y. E. Pavitt, s—o, G—l, 6 —3; Howden v. Correll, G—2, 6—3; Trcadwell v. Watts,' 6—l, 6—l ;• Jackson and ,Grcen v. Hamilton and O. Pavitt, 4—6, 6—o, 6—4; Clere • ■and Callender v. Swinburne and R. Pavitt, v 6—2, 6—l; Howden and Treadwell v. Correll and Watts, 6—2, 6—3; Mrs. Wagg v.: Miss Bridson,, G—l, 6—o; Miss Callender v. Miss Shaw,. 6—4, G—3; Miss-C. Stevens v. Miss Eeid, 6-rO, 6—2; Miss F. Stevens v. Miss Morris, G—o, 6—2; : Mrs. Wagg. and' Miss Callender v. Misses, Bridson and Shaw, G—4, 6—4; Misses Stevens , v. Misses Reid and Morris, G—l, 6—l v . , Pctone . won against Victoria' Collo'ge by 13 rubbers to 2 rubbers,' 26 sets"to 7 sets, 179 games, to' 97 games. . The Petone players are '. mentioned first:— 7 '. Cornell v. • Eichelbaura; 6—3, 6—l;' Parkinson v. Rutherford, G—2, 3—G, G—l; Duncan v., Gr-2;.,Austin v. Fair, IHS, 6—4, 6—5 j.■ Curtis." v. Duncan; '4—6, ',4—6; Arcus 'v. Isaacs, 2—6,\6-:5,' 6—2'/Cornell and Parkinson v. Eichelbaum and Rutherford, 6—2, G—t; ; Duncan and Austin v. Mansfield arid Fair. o—3; 6—3; Curtis and Arcus v.. Dnnca'n and ' Isaacs;' 6;' Miss. Home' v; Miss Macln-, tosh;- 6—l, 6—3;'' Miss Beimetfc'.v: Miss Lawry, : G—l; fr^-l;.Miss Curtis v. Miss-Barkas, (r-3, ; 6—l;,Mi?s Carter .v., Miss. .Still, 6—3, 67-4;.. , llissos:Hor'rie and-'Bentietf;y. Misses Macintosh : and Barkas, .6—l, 6—2; Misses Curtis and Carter . y. Misses'L'awry and 5ti11,..6^2,;G—5..,.■■■ ■ Muritai-won. against .Khandallah by 9 rub- . bers to ,3.-rubbers (3 rubbers', halved),'.2l sejts : 1 to 13. sets, 160.-games'to .136 . games! Muritai player's aro mentioned ' first:—Jones v. Fl&m----1 mgi G—2, 3—6, 6—2;, Wright v.-G. Richardson,' > ,G—s, G—2; Howden -v. Hutohings, .6—3,i ; 6—5; Sanson v. , ,C. Richunlson, .5—6, &-4i; 6—5; Harton v. Leoriard, 6 i -2, :5- : r6, 6^-2;'Hord- : ' 1 man v.. 6—o,"G—o; Jones and! Wright 1 v. Fleming and Richardson, ,6—2,. G—2; San--1 son and Harton v. Hutcliings and C. Richard- ! ; son, G-r5,-6—4; Howden and Herdman v. -Leori- ■ ard . and Heenan, 67-I, , G—4; Miss Jenkins v. Miss Clark, S—l—6; Miss' Low v. : Miss Rich-' ardson, 6—l, 3—6; Miss Isaacs v. Miss Mackay, 1 ' 5—6, 3—6; Miss Flimmer v. Miss Batham, I—^6, ; .6—i; Misses Jenkins and Low v.. Misses Clark 1 and Richardson, o—6/2—6; Misses Isaacs'and; ' I'limmer v. Misses Mackay and Batham, 2—6^ [ - • ' '■'■ V ■ PENNANTS. i .Newtown A'wori against Newtown Bby 7 1 sets to 2 sets,:G7. games to 34 games.. The Newtown. A players are mentioned first:— ! Powell v. Luke, 9—l; Thwaites "v. Emenyi .. 9—l; Prince v. Mitchell, 9—6; Godber. v. Smith,' 9—4 ;: Powell and v. Emeny ! and Mitchell, 9—3; Prince arid Godber v/Luke ■ ' and Smith, 9—4; Miss Vcitch v. Miss Powell, 3—7; Miss M'Lcan v. Miss P. Voitch, 7—l; -Misses Veitch"and M'Leari v. Misses Powell and- ! P. Veitch, 3-7. ' / ' ' ' - RACKET. Brougham Hill won ogainst Victoria College B rby 9 sets to nil, 75 games to 23 games, f The . Brougham Hill players are mentioned- , first:— '■ li Amos v. Mason, 9—o; Long v. Inder, 9—l; 1 Dawson v. M'Alister, 9—2; Manoy v. Toms, : 9—l; Amos and Long v. Inder and Mason, . 9—7; Dawson i'arid Manoy.' v. - M'Alister and Toms, 9—4; Miss Carter v.; Miss Thornton, 7—o; Miss' Mack .v. Miss Johnson, 7r-5; Misses Carter, :and . .Mack y. ' Misses Thornton and ■ Johnson, 7—3. ; : . .■ v > Trinity B won against -Khandallah by 5 sets > to 4 sets, games even,, 57 each. The Trinity 1 players are mentioned first;— - ~ ' Bowdcn v. Dallard, 9—7;-Dick- v. . Taylor,' . .9—l; 'Parker v. Caserley,' B—9; Anios 'v. Smith; 9—6; Bowden and Dick v. Dallard and Taylor, 9—5; I'arkeT and Amos v. Caserley and Smith, 3—9; Miss Crewes v. Miss Willans, 7—6; Mrs. i Smart .v. Miss Willans, 2—7; Miss Crewes and i Mrs. Smart v. Misses Willans, I—7. .'
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091129.2.15
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 676, 29 November 1909, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,171LAWN TENNIS Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 676, 29 November 1909, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.