ORE=TREATING PATENTS.
NO INFRINGEMENT. IBy Telegraph.-Preae A««orltt(|(in -Ooeyrlthll London, November 18. Tho Lord Chancellor (Lord Loreburn) delivered judgment of the Houso of Lords in the easo of the British Ore Concentrating Company versus the Minerals Separation Company, in favour of the latter company, with all costs. Lords Halsbury, Ashbourne, Atkinson] and Shaw concurred in the judgment. Sydney, November 19. The Minerals Separation, 'Limited, appeal case mentioned in to-day's London cablegrams refers to what is known as tho Elinoro patents case. _ The judgment Teverseg tho finding of the lower appeal court, and restores the judgment of Mr. Justice Neville. It haa also been announced that tho patents of the Minerals Separation, Limited, aro no infringement of the Elmo'ro patents. ' I ~t, -.. *~ p-. <•*•
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091120.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 669, 20 November 1909, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
121ORE=TREATING PATENTS. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 669, 20 November 1909, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in