SHOULD IT BE PUBLISHED.
Sir,—A good judgo rusvor .gives reasons, If' : ' Dr. Findlay had merely excused his refusal o{ . ; the deputation's request by plain - use of . tho' • legend "Unconstitutional," lie might have got-ve* through. But ho wriggled and explained, but ' - ' the explanation will never satisfy the pubho " ■ that .Mr. Bishop's position entitled him to •irtoro favoured treatinent •• than , Mr. Bishop;- ■ Tho explanation makes for an appearance oi > ' absolutism on !Mr. Bishop's part, which-is not in accordance .with , British ideas of fair play, v : If one side is published, tho other sido oughtito be. -Mr.- 'Bishop's; .handling of tho com. . - '? mission wiis nioro; than. arbitrary, it was au- ■ - - toeratic. 'Ho did. liot try tho ease, as'it wouldhave! been tried by tho Supremo Court, and. lie is. not entitled to its mona.—r am,-etc., • : - . HENUY-BODLET.' | '' November. 17 t 1009,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091119.2.7.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 668, 19 November 1909, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
136SHOULD IT BE PUBLISHED. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 668, 19 November 1909, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in