Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE HOUSE.

;- > BUSINESS. /?::; ;.,, '■.*!.'^en'^iie:'.HonS : eym'et,: ; y l e''3Urdaj' > thie discus- . iion'.of ■comraittees' : ireppTts .and' other formal ;.:bnsJness: -iss«<id;itiii;U.is;pii: /^'.■.;■'■;;;■■;':■'; ,- i ■'.Mr;.Ma'ss'eynhen-a'sked.'that-discussion shonld beiallowed.bn answers; to.questions. -.The Prime .Minister'agteed; to '■ the.;request. 7 '.■'•:, . : ",•■'• ■ AND INSTI-:-;';.:^-;a. - : :: : r';'} TuTi oNs.;.:'■'.;. x,;; ■„■; \ y , : . ■:■■}' The : dis'cussidnS'in' committeol of 'the ;: Hospi. , h ;and."Charitable - Bill'was f rii< iumeil;'.at.-:7.3ovp'.m. ■;:,■; / '~ ■: ,';;'■.,' '.;.; '■;' \,(Manawatu),' mbVed^an' additibn i:A to; v ;i ,-.-:bf■.; 39 ' (wh'ichi":-deals < with subsidies ;to':,boards: in're. Bp'ectiOf'moneys'.receiyed).as follows:" Provided 1 tb'at'^.herrMiister.'V-.in.C'ascertaining^-.wKether' :/a.'>boa^d:has' ; sufficient,-funds -to', carry'.• out., the 'adoiinistration: of ;,this; Act, ', shall, ; not, be'. en-. titled ..to'/jtake.inw:consideration''any pecurii-ary.-.-.D'eq'uest,ori any interest, derived Irbm' such' . peciiniaryvhequest.'} 'y ■';■■'• , :: j: ii'M-- : ■,■;.., '.Y , ,-':'..,-The .MnjfISTER.-.said:' that: ijff. the past np'j'hardship-.h'adv.resulted:from 'the.system in .force; v :'The--member ' need•'have• no■ fear -in : the V;:V-v'-'i;'/ " :j '■■• ' .'■' : ■ r , ..; :■': -The-amendment ;was 1 ■'••■■■■■' : ; - ': -'.The'-MIMSI'ER,. referring.to siib-Clause 2of Section Si^'said;that the'.committee: to'.which theimatter.had.be'en-refetred'recom'melided that the flthird i of; the'proposed :echedules ; should be : . adopted;:, tfn". respect', of capital: expenditure; it :: -was'proposed!that-.the:;^i;for .£ 'subsidy shonld ■•..be , retained; of'.the new,.schedulG: . -boards tp' secure! . administration. -If. the,: adminjstra-: '.'tidh"yere.'.as"econoniical''' l ;..a» i-ppssible'"without' '■■'■■ efficiency'being'ijnp'aifedi--if. would tend' towards .' iniireas'edVsubsidy'. "He moved that sub-Clause' CJsh6uld : be "deleted,.and 'in'its'place' the follow-' ing ' suWclanse ,be ■ inserted:—"For' eyory' pound , levied .:by l| |the Vboard v from vcoritributory local.' ; .anth6nbes;under ; ,.the: provisions, -hereinafter. • coitaihed»m :thafc'behalf;".:(1) One pound■•'■ in .f respect 'of'-capital, expendithre; (2) ■■ an. a'moimt ".determined;;in: accordance ..with : .the third : 'Bohednle:;in'ire'spe<it':'of" expenditure' other- than ::ca'pital-exj)enditure.":'> i /; , .i;■•"-.;■ ■;.-.•■'. !:;:■ ■'. . ' ; . '•., The third '■ schedule (which was approved) is; "8S followS^-r-i-V. ', : : /; V ; v->-' ; ' ■'- '':■ '■ ■■ .- ''-.- '■ '■

Bateable value. ■ Bate of lovy per head of the '' . : .v\ • - population. .'' ihopopnlatlon. • •/.' r 1" " Under Under' Under Under ' : : ■ 2a. 6d., .3a.,': 3s. 6(1.i 4-5. Not ■... •; s.>Under-, - but bat.•'but but under 2s. 'not; : not'/ not-not 45.-

Sir WILLIAM; STEWAItD. moved an amend- ■ irient to'empoweri the'.se6rfetary;,:as. well 'as: the. •;^ appl it-W ■ : ■ • Tho .MINISTER said; that, ,the..sqvernm«ht: .'V^Bted.^^Cn4!oi^ble:! ; al^til6Ht7'' : C6''digit.' •. the: declaration. ' ". >• ■ >*■■,<}-'j-. ' ,;The, amendment-was lost on thervWces:' v ; Clanse.L7Vspro v i<lirtgithat a 1 biiilrd'iniayj'con-v-tract withi>.another r -body;to-.affbrdl'relietVywaa . extetidod;-,. pn.-the;-,Minister's imotiOil; to apply to . Government ; sanatoria/v\. ' . ...

• A.Cbiiibinedi -bistrijots.' V^'-'.-i'; , \^.'.^Z''--'S-..'^- .■: 'itiki^jfEß-moved a> new -to en.l ; 'able' the. ~G6yMor,..;:by: ; !?OrdeWn-Couhqil, ■ to ■'■'■'. ■combine ;;the - -'districts'- : ofV two or more' local 0 -■:' V%iitjiprities.-. : eitoated ■'■■'ivithiii.'. --a '-'-Hospiial dis- - ...trict; and declareithat "for the purposes of-the Public Health: Aot :the .hospital.;. and ■oharit- ,<■; able: raid;.board;, of;;'the should be '■;'. Adeemed: to-beiho local, .authority' within the J,combihed. ; ,;districtsr V ! :-"'■: , ■:' :; ■'■'. '.'::■:'•'■ '■ v- ; . vlhe- clause'iwas: 1 agreed^to. ['■'■' '"">.',:: '?':■'■■'■: ■ '. ',A;new.;clause,. was .also, moved providing that : --Vv*H.■ costs:and ; .expenses. incurred 'by a 'hospital ./■•■;•■ end charitable/jaid;:board 'for ... pur-: ': -poses sh6uld-.be.recoverable;by the board'as;a , ■',-'debt: due ; by;.the .lpcal.. authority,-' subject -to .a.;nght:'of.appeal-:by.;the local-authority to the ..-■-■ Minister.;:-; ■>•';-,;'■ ; v.. ; >-":'/.■•.,. ■■-■";■.- ■■■.■■"■

:-.■■. Mr. TOWLDS explained, that the :object of /, {.these ■ clausesivwas eponortdcal -administration. ■ Jjpcal "bodies -.could • combine :together to.. get ■'.-, their;: sanitary.'inspectiori; fumigation, b'r ! '.6thet ' \°«; performed:.by pthe- hospital, and charit- : able ■aid:; boards which had the 'proper means ■■■•;■..• at/its, command..■ - I .'-. : . ■ c ' v - » •'' : •■ ; ' V^-■' ; >WTS!T (Eiccarto'n)vMid-many ; - loca) :;;■. to : get' rid of their -re- - . eponsiDilities. in :thfe; , .yiy; but' the amalgama- . . tion shpuld:..l>e at '-the- request'of the local i bodjee, and not mercly/'onvthe 'recommendation • ottnc inspector-General,'after considering any .-.; xepresentation made' by. the';local authorities/ , ..as_waspropossd in-the clause. ■' , ■-: : , ' Mr.: HEEBIES (Tauraiiga) thought that despotic : n powers were : being given -,- to ■ the : In-.; Bpoctor-General and Gpvernor-in-Council. ' Enor- ■. r ,n6us;. expenditure'-might be -thrown on local bodies:.which would' not: h'dve been incurred , ii If one district ■were affected.by-.a'n ■outbreak':of-, infectious:dis- ;.;. ease, local, bodies .outside; the district might be .■■■; .involved an,the expense of,dealing with it. pointed out that as ". :.ih"e clause .ystood-;if; only ■ meant: that the .'ob- •■■,. jecnons 'of.local. ; bodies to- their' combination ' would'-be -considered. If was 'also' .proposed to' --. repeal : ,Section.:.7,,;of the' Public Health Act, ..'::• -}Wf,'. providing -thai. contiguous., local- - : ' bodies" ■■;■:.could purposes, and.ono or'other ;of 'them .appointed: to-carry out any -• . work'for the combined district '. ... - ■', ■■ ■ :; i: worked : 6atistactorily,,uand. : : the.!, new.: -arrangement •"' mil ■' e JP e « tetl >i. ! 'to V.;be; : . !'an Thei::Mmister ; ,;offered/to"-delete -the.."words - -.. ■ after, considering any.: representation' made : 'bj : ;tho-local and ■-•substitute :"with', the , . consent- of.,.;.,The,:amendment was agreed to, . ■ : .end,the clause '■ '' ' ''■ ■■' ' i .'. was'adfpted empowering boards' •'- ,to ,makeVagreemen'ts for Jspecial terms as to , .mairitenance'-'iii:'hospitals of members- 'of ■■friendly:;sooieties.',. , ;Su.ih"agreements ■may,'' ex- ... tend . to;-the J ,inainte tance-of the , '-" v }™?>: a™XcmWr.M-\p!!.-.::the'members of'the ;' Bociety, and mayeitendieither'toalltheniem-, , bers, or.,only ' to sr>e<Siitcd: ! class6s •■ of'members.* ... Such..: agreements rr'shaff.'-not.' be ■■■ for i' a • longer : "period than;five'years^ ,, .;:": ■■■.■:■"-!.'■ '■ -- ;

-.; Nurses', ,;;,-;:-'. ;./Lv .;" '"'■y,'■'•.-. «:'■'■.•''■•'. ■ ; :llr.-" HINE -.(Straifordl^oved "a' new clause ■ that-the hours'ot.nurses, attendanis, and pro- . batxoners , in' hospitals stnuld not exceed 56 per '. : week;i;,: , .iV;i.;-^; 1 ;.;: : A;>;^;';i,v;: i : './.:<:■■ /•■;;-■■ ..■'■>. <- , .'-Ai-.amendiriont was mcyed to insert; the words . cases, of emergency.", It: was pointed ■ out.'that in ;for 'example, Mj.:-Hine hot.bo practicable. ■ Sln : ,ANl)liaspN?(UiKiurrt)'-suggested' that ■ the-hours should to excced : eight orti-any one. day; ' fif:\ if-*--- , "' ! ' ' ' - : - :' The'clause, amendment,- was ; :•■ adopted.':-' : ; ;■:■!■(«;=; '■■■. ■■■■ -J '■"■•'■ Tflo;. following -. hew••clause was '■■ agreed. to -.—' ..■ "The members of; every : old board and■'.'■ the !.- trustees- of : dvery>separate institution '■■ under ' the"-Hospitals and i.Charitable institutions Act, 1908/; who-are':in'.office'.at the passing of .this . Acti; shall -continue' , to..hold ofnee until' the ■ commencement •' of 'this;'. Act,- .'notwithstanding .' ariyiiirbvisiohtas to'tttsir -poriodic'al retirement ;-.containe(l-in;any': ; Act.hereDy!Tepealed; and no .'election;-:of -appointmont-- ot members'of. any ..Buch : ,bpard.orof trustees:of : anysuch separate ■institution' shall;bo_-made; in-the- interval :be- -■'• tweeni'the .passing ,of.'this iAct: and -the cotn.:ment'ement thereof,-.;except : for.•;the .purpose• 'of ;fillfpg-.'aiiy:casual-vacancy." ■:;:,"-. •• '-■■- •■..'"• ■; piscussion'))f.'Schedules^^'.■vr.,-.^;-:■..:';.,:■■:,"; : . ■ '. T??hen.' the ■ first ■. reached, which -.-■■ isnumSrates, the.-counties/included' in>hospital '■' districts arid 'the''old?boards' superseded; .; : '-. :' ■: Mr;. STALIiWOETHY'.:(Kaipata)■•• moved 'for. subdivision of iho North of-Auckland 'districfc ; "'--""- ; Mrl -POWLDS : then gave an explanation of his Intentions.- Ee'-said'he thought that there had b^n'-'ft weai ; deal;.too ym'-uch:subdivision;:of i hos;

pital district? already.' If he had attemptedto I xjarry-o'lit-'the thorough amalgamation whichhe thought desirable, ho would never have got ,tho;'Bill throiigh the House. .To'some extent the evils of subdivision ha'd been'diminishcd'by the provision 1 -for; graduated subsidies. The central .department -would also check the ox.'travagant administration which often resulted from the.duplication of institutions.. Ho Was not/in 1 a-position to accept,any, proposal for subdivision of a district. At the same time at that stage ho thought that members should oxetcise their own judgment, and in order to their-opinions he would divido on eVery motion. . - : Mr. ERASER (Wakatipu) expressed surprise at the ] Minister's attitude. Considering the of the schedlule and the neces-sity-of not haying too small districts he would .have-expected the- Minister to -say that the schedule had been arrived at after full consideration, and that he intended to stick by it. In such a decision ho would have been supported -by a : large number o£ members, could s not be supposed to know all' about the ' districts'. • Every amendment moved . that night ■ wjould :be 'carried': afterwards. Members would say to ono another: "You support •my ainendinent, and I will - support yours." He hoped that the Minister would still make the statement he had suggested. - ...... . Mr. NEWMAN (Manawatu) said he agreed with.. Mr.'. Fraser, -and "he, would support the Minister on every amendment. '■'..' .

J'The Usual- Policy." . . ' Mr. HERRIES (Tauranga) said that the Minister wns following the usual policy of -the Government in shirking responsibility. He shonld lead the House, and not let the House lead ■ the Minister'.-' If the Minister was going to throw, the schedule. on the floor of the House,' he would '.vote' for every alteration that' might; be/proposed. They looked to the Minister*'for an .expression of..opinion as to whether the amendment was desirable. If Mr, Fowlds-.was not going .to back up his Bill, what was-the use of bringing down,the Bill afa.ll? ..'lf he' was afraid of alienating a few votes.by refusing an alteration which was askedJfor-byJone-of: his supporters, he .was abdicating his , proper position. :: :''•-.' ../' ■vMr. .REED (Bay of'lslands) urged that there was a unanimous desire in the district for the-subdivision. It! was only this particular, ' amendment-.which Mr. Fowlds intended leavin'tf to the. judgment of-the House. ■■' • . vThoI.MINISTER, in further 'explaining his ppsiti6n;':said:':thftt ; while he preferred '.that ■no subdivisions should take place _at all, he recognised :.that the < position' of, this northern district-was exceptional. If, when he made up .the?schedule, he had had r the Bill "with-the-'provisions;that were..in.it/now, hewould have .dividedA;the district.- : -., yV ; ~■-■■ , ;■ ' .-• Mr.jjraser:':lf:you had:',tpld:us.that,-at first I'should-.'not ' have'saidve;word.'.. '';,' t-,"■ ■ ;''•' : .

■'";iMr.,;iPOWLI)S said ■ that' other'.'subdivisions iwere'"'proposed - ; which'ie-: thought .we're ; uniHseiSVHe.had:.not wished:to :give'■ thei.impression-, that 'he' wanted to drive.members' ; t6 .support., the.,-schedule.- . Hβ had been, 'trying all.!through :to. benefit:by the, opinions of the .w'hoie House. '■ He recognised • that the : great '. bulk\ of - the : members' were: not in • the . same position•'to''know the merits of 'each-caSe,:as he -was,; )and; he -was .prepared ..to. give -the House, his views on: each-case,-. He.o.was. prepared :,to.;'accept ■ this subdivision. '■■.■ :. .-. .;'

Subdivision.;.'.;- ■ .■'.•■..■''.'■■ !, '..'."v ','■■'■' '.■^.■■■'.' : . : - : -' : ffho- proposed'.North of .Auckland district was' subdivided to form two' districts'as follows :r-Bay' of." Islands district, Mongbnui, Whangaioa, 'Bay of Islands,, and ■■Hofianga counties;' Kaipara-Marsden' district, Whangarei, 'HbbsrjiJ.Y and Qtamatea 'counties. '.'■..•':. . ■~, ■: iXJpdri the suggestion tof the'Minister,'Botorua was taken 'from tho proposed Bay of Plenty district and 'included in.the proposed Waikato district.', V.'. ■^'•■"' ■. .'■ " ■■"•"..■ v '' ■ "''■■.■•■■ ;It; was agreed, on the motion , of Mr: Poland;, by '30 to 57,: to !amohd the boundaries of • tha proposed •' Thames. Hospital • district, ■. by adding the words, .''but inot including Waihi borough;" and , it :, was: resolved on the voices ; to consti-! trite a new hospital district,■ to: be , called,: the Waihi■; 'distfict,"':and to. compriso the borough ■Mr.'vHAlilj "(Waipawa) moved that-the propoged'■'Hawke's Bay district .should comprise only' Wairoa 'and Hawke's Bay coiintibs. *~ . The ;MINISTER said,'he ,would, accept. ■ tho amendment, which w^'s. approved.: : '-It was Wen decided that a new district, .to 1 be called tKe-: Waifajv'a'"- : district,", and-.' to' include Waipawa; : Patanßata,:■. Weber,?.Woodvillei' Dahnevirke,-..-' anil y AVaipukurau, ; cotinties, -.should be constitfttbd. : , ' : . ' ' -. •' ,' ■. Mr.; jEAECE, (Patea),'moved- that the constitutibnVjOf the. proposed Taranaki district shpuld/^e^.mjeßJa^tOi'read.that;the district should- c6.mp'ri'se''-.thoso,:portions, of i'Egmoht county north .of ;Arawata_Eoad instead'.of Glifton, farahaki> and : Egmont counties, ibut',the amendment .was lost 'by'Bß to 19. : "\.t-. :■ vMr.S,DUNe i AN--V(Wairau).rm'o'vedi that .tho clause -proposing i.to'. form l a'•! Marlborqugh' district ..be , struck out. and in ■ its'.place ■there.b'e Constituted; a, Wair'au district,, to embrace Marl'borough counly_,; but excluding iPicton and Plctoh Road district, and a Picton district to "include ' Sparidsj ■ Picton, and^Picton' district. The Minister accepted ttfe amendment, which was..agreed to;,,;; ■ ■ ~,■ •..-..,'■ '-■', . . .. Mr: GRAHAM, '.(Nelson) moved!- ; to; ■: include Mufchesbn cbunty in the proposed Nelson' district instead!of-:.the proposed Inangahua dis;trict; This , amendment.was accepted By the Minister: and adopted.". ■■ .'".-■'■ ■ ■■ ; ;Mr..DAYET. (Christchnrch East) moved.that ■Ashb'urteii' ceunty .stidnld be included, in" the , proposed : ', North '; Canterbury, district instead of forming! a separate district by itself. .Mr.,NOSWOETHT (Ashburton)'opposed' the proposal.;; :-.■■';.•■ ;. •■/ "'.•.'■ •• :;. : . :,. , TheMINISTER said he could, not agree to .■the'amendrhenti..:,. ..,.,: '■■.: .': . ■."'■. •- • The ■amendment was lost on; the'voices. ~ .;:The remainder of the Jrst schedule : was adopted.- ■V^':; , ~ -i,, . ..; ,-;-••:. '■- ■:■ .' ■-.■ ■-.;.. ,■; Separate 'Institutions.. ;v, ' -■-. J V : ' Mr.' iCOLVIN :(Buller): moved .that' the Charleston and; Denhiston- hbspitals be added to the list ofseparate institutions in the second schedule, .-'■'■ -■■•: . .'■■ The.MINISTER'said if the Charleston Hospital was/'included- it would receive nothing from ■: ,The■ Denniston , Hospital • was ~not yet\in; existence, and he- did' not 6ee iow iit-'could-.lwy included.'.'-- • r .. :; : .■■ -.'.■.'■■•.- The'inclusion of the Charleston Hospital was agreed -to on the. voices, • and' the proposal to' include .the 'Denniston Hospital was -- ; agreed to on a division; by one. vote-7-27 to 26. .-' '•'-' '.' A; prolonged . dificussion r to'ok> place'on -a .schedule.'affecting, the Taurangi Old Men's Home, '. Ashburton. - .'■"■.'-. .- ■; . : ' .Mr.. MASSEY .proposed, .at 1 a.m.,.tiat the Bill should ,be allowed to go on, and before it came .to : the third reading.a conference should be h e 'd between tho members interested and the , / Minister/to. draft a 'clause to meet! the point that:had arisen.. At the third reading the Bill could be; recommitted for '■ the purpose of inserting it. , '■~ -. ' -. ■ . ... • ' ■-.--: -.. The suggestion ; was-agreed'to by theilin'ister, ■after Mr.-Massey had.declined'a'suggestion'by Mr.' Fowlds-to leave the amendment "to,the House.:'.';• . ."'."■'. The' Teidatning schedules' were agreed to with ■only:'minor amendments. ' . ' ', -The House-adjourned at; 1.15 a'.mc ' . '

• vr V ■■.... under under under, under * \ ' 23. ' 23.6(3.' 6d.' - ■" J- C .■■■■ .81 d. x. d. -g. d...'.s. d. ;s. d: . s-'d. Coder-£100 24 3 24 0 23 9 ' 23 3 22 3 f 20 3 . Unuer. :£150' ... 2S 3 fSO- 9 :.22-3 ' 21 3' 19 3 ' Under .£200..22 3 . 22 0:.:;21 9 21 3 20 3., 18 3 ■ Under *250 213 • 210. "20 9 20.3 19 3 17 3 :• Under\2300 .:.l 20 3" ,20 0 19 9 19 3 18 3: 16.3. : Under .'£330 •: V.'.! 19 3 .19 0 V 18 9 18 3 IV 5 15 3. Under £400 ... 18 3 >8 0 17 9 17 3 16 3 3 Under. '£450-,;,::.-:17--3 17 0 16 9 • 16 3 ,15 3 '13.3; Not under/£450 16 3 • 16 0 15 9 15 3 .• 14 3 -12 3'

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091119.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 668, 19 November 1909, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
2,002

THE HOUSE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 668, 19 November 1909, Page 5

THE HOUSE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 668, 19 November 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert