MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
■•nswcr:;c^rg«:of-Isdng.;fc:MolW'Srderly of,-.fSviromVs'oraolnorsou"or : W .BOns^n^own.i'^e'admitteHK'^cha?^ to??hreo 5 hs ! ,^|r^,en^t,,h^ constable.stated Jttat-i'ccused-toM 'him bridge, appeared bor-^took-if/housebreaking. ':"M? K rWi?"*' C^1 ior Hhdrt: <vr appeared
■-.■-. Stoll.v .Taylor, s who; hniv ™ '■ „w • •' >:■' 7:' days', imprisonment "h,?,l{? •' -also sentenced .to : :ttrc6 mffl* '?fc. ? .» -°? ■• (orceins: an idle anil ■ S^lvS SOnmont HenryMatiev,on;Tulsd^.b n t4::dw'S l^ st prove .his bohaviour; • H? w „^Li ( i not V^ di^rderlr.. p er S o^"^tha ; S^,? 1 f :,dl V^ ia siiliiiiiiill w tt 3-im P o3 e <r'on*Si^Sfv ?lpi) u o,l ? >o^; ' : Baturdny;v;tt-cllwJl^*t^J^ ,y l<?? r^>
J,;.3 ,:a;|rain and a'landslip." ".' \£ A eomporisation' case occupied tho ftttontion.bf ■Ot. M Arthur yesterday.. William Henry Bal-,,linSor,-.plttlnbor, proceeded- against tho Mayor, ..councillors, I 'land citizens of \vellington.for .£2OO for alleged damago to his propertyat Kolburne. r ±hß statement of claim'sot. out that, between March 15 and April, 13 last, the .defendants, by •ii ~ aml servants, .■■ '■ .wrongfully and illegally entered plaintiff's land and constructed -a drain, thus appropriating a large portion of tho land. In conscnuenco of the excavation and construction of.tho drain, a fall of earthoccurred on, or about April, 11, and damaged a factory-and 'other, property belonging to plaintiff. -, ,-',:. - ■'■■■!; ;. ■ W. H. Morton,. City. Engineer, expressed tho opinion ,that jtho drain had nothing to do. with tho slip,'which, in his opinion, was due to' faulty -excavation' for the'side of the house. Tho presence of the drain tended rather to increase .the stability of the ground. .-■ - J, jr. Moriee, assistant city engineer under Mr.' Morton; agreed with what his chief had said. ■Decision-will be given on Tuesday.;.
;-iV-;'W FOR, WORK DONE.- - : '. ; '' : - ' • The hearing;of the'claim for £i '13s. for work done between ' Charles, Tandy, , coachbuildor, plaintiff (Mr. Ward),-and Allen Orr, carrier, defendant. (Mi,v'Hindmarsh), and of defendant's cauntorclnirh; for £3 10s. for alleged defective workmanshipiivas concluded. -■; ;..- : ' ,T ii? m , a ? istrat «- Bavo judgment for defendant on the claim, and for'defendant.'on tho counterclaim for £2110s;, -with costs „S3. 3s. ■■."..,- ':,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091118.2.76.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 667, 18 November 1909, Page 11
Word count
Tapeke kupu
312MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 667, 18 November 1909, Page 11
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.