Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE REYNOLDS CASE.

Sir,—l notice in this morning's issue of your ; :<. papotthe ( decision; of'the Court in the cascof'v. "■ Reynolds, -the dismissed Customs official. :.;I-;;*': :'.■; am absolutely surprised that a man coold be so ..■■.-■ unjustly treated. •' Hero is a v man dismissed-; : . from his cm'plpyment, for a charge that called for « departmental inquiry. At ( tho/time'of '' .- the'inquiry Reynolds was ill, iand of course, -■' could not attend, so ho.instructed his solicitor'.'/ ; to appear for him.' Tho Court, consisting 'of'■•..'■'•'■' Messrs.' Hutton : and Bowles,, refused to hear ..the'V ' .''.'■ solicitor, and prbcoeded' with-the.inquiry with-;. ■'-.-.' out' calling' for tiny defence. . Could:any 'sane ''■''.' person, conceive : such a ridiculous procedure? Charges wcrel brought against Reynolds,'for; : ';' which 'he:was refused; permission' to.'&fend-v;'- , ? himself;' in fact,' he was ■ absolutely' refused ■a ■ '. hearing. Very just, wasn't it? Where are the ■'■■>'■% various Government employees' societies, that , »; r they-do not-.protest against such a;:'seriou»': V ■'. precedent for. a Court to establish? ■''■In.:my:r'',: - opinion, 6very ■man: or woman, employed, in- : >\ ; , Government must ask or ■ herselt if they ; are, safe in their positions. /As'it is .now,,; a, ; ;';. ; charge can}; be.unade ngainst.,.onTonc;' l and no.:, •;.; guarantee j)f a fair, and .impartial I;•.-'■ *;i;'sincerely hopo moro will. bp;lienrd«of■ this. ' ter, as it affects all ■ State •. employees';.''/ In: iny' .V :.'•'■'. opinion, this ■is a .very important matter, and r.v.;'; it. is to be hojied members of Parliament' will "':; ;. have some questions to ask thoEo>who are Te-'.U V. sponsible for this -muddle.. I. think; you , .wittk-'i ■;', agree with me;, sir, that it has t cometo a'niceV,', V tfiing if-a person caniibt cither'defend himself : .- in person "or. geta'solicitprtoappearforhim,:.irhieh.amounts;to the same , thing.-. I siiiccrely \)P,:: hope, sir, the "■. will»teko this'; case *, :; up, and got the public to^Tcalite -what"tuay'.bt ;'..'• ,'■ expected in timo tq.come if;this Court of Jus- :!.:. tice (?) should,extend their:powers.' , Thankini , ;';;,;•; you- for-the sp'ace,; and again hoping; you' wi]}' v , .'•.!. cliamiiion this Case.—l am,- etc.;- •: . -.:■■'■■•'.; ,''''■'■:■: '-■■-. :■ \ ■.■■; ■'■■' •■■' :'■-;:•'-■ -'DiSGUSTEDy :--\.\v; Packakariki. '.' ,-: ', ";;, . ■'. . : ''•'■■'■'■'■, [We haye.already commen,tcd on thisjcasej .O:

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091110.2.11.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 660, 10 November 1909, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
310

THE REYNOLDS CASE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 660, 10 November 1909, Page 3

THE REYNOLDS CASE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 660, 10 November 1909, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert