Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Dominion. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1909. PARLIAMENTARY MANNERS.

. In the present little intermission of ] Parliamentary, business one might do worse , than give some attention to what has seemed .the most notable feature of the current session'to those who.have had to watch the House of- Representatives' at all closely. There are a number of things thata public-with some excuse for feeling disappointed, may think we refer to: ,quite. ■ a -number of eccentric characteristics, have appeared, in the House. Many of them, no doubt, will be parts of the whole that we have in mind, which-is, a general; deterioration, of Parliamentary manners,,; arid a ■ lowering,. therefore, ■ not only.of. the tone of .'the Assembly, but of this morality of its practice. "What is even worse, the levity, and undignified behaviour of a- section of' the House cannot fail .to. work towards that worst'of all injuries to tho public good: ! the development of a Parliament, for which neither the'serious nor the -frivolous citizen can have any respect. For this result, we Had better, say iit.once.'tho- Speaker, the. Prime Minister, and'the Leader of the /Opposition ; are' almost equally , responsible. ■• One may enter the House almost at any hour now with the' fullest confidence that! one : will be shocked ;by some .striking' evidence of the disappearance .of the old standard of -Parliamentary;, conduct. - , A: little observation will show that , the unpleasant interjec..tions, interruptions,; and disprderliness corao mainly from a certain back.-.bench' group of, Ministerialists, but they are hot entirely confined;to this- , quarter of the Chamber, v Wo do not expect any brilliant display of wit nowadays from' the M.P., but we hayea, right to resent that particular sort, of and. that .mannerof. interjection or repartee, which ;we are 'accustomed to. associate with ; 'the "pit" atia music-hall or the younger men at a sports smoking' concert. ''■■; >. •'. ■;. One or. two bad examples may-be quoted < on this point. ■ Tho , other day a shrewd ■ and capable .member of the Opposition was delivering a serious speech. One of the.back, bench: group suddenly relieved ;hishigh spirits by a ludicrously v inane .interjection, :"What ' about Bobrikoff.?'■'. 1 The significant feature -of the, incident was; that nobody, appeared .to' consider \ .that the interjection was devoid of wit, . sense, , or'propriety. A member can with • -impunity. roar across the Chamber' "I'll settle you.-' A,Minister can give the lie in; thinly-veiled ; language ; half a dozen ' times to an opponent, not only without calling forth a protest, but actually without causing anybody to/ see 'anything either improper or unusual in his be- ■ hayiour. 'The . deterioration , has. been progressive: it began when; Me. Seddon's place fell vacant, and it has continued in ;the ■ present Parliament, despite the fact 1 that it'has'better material than the. pro-; ceding Parliament, partly through ' tho failure of the Leaderof the House, partly, through. Miti, Massey's neglect to take a i. stand/against the bad of.- the noisiest.inter jectors,' and partly through the.wide tolerance of the Speaker. Me. ' Seddon was one of the most wilful and persistent 'trespassers against the strict , laws; of'precedent, but he had an instinctjve feeling for the'preservation 6f order. With all his faults, he was a 'good Leader ;■ of the House; he could always be relied :■ upon to defend law and order in the con.duct,'of business—a state of things which, as a shrewd - politician; ho realised he must preserve. Anarchy, he know, might ultimately bo prejudicial to his own iu:j, terests as a- party leader. Although, therc- ' r fore, many of the political canons set,up ... during his reign wore: anything but' adI. mirablc, , the Parliamentary, canons that - ho received from the past sufforcdno in- '».: jury. In.his.clay, and of course in the days of all his predecessors, the House was a well-conducted Assembly. Since his' ,time..the. House has lapsed, and • shows • signs of becoming ,a disorderly gathering. • t - '■; The?platitude that the New Zealand House of Eopresentatives ""compares/ fayourably,',with.the. Assemblies . of other countries is not often heard nowadays. No doubt some people may repeat it when they read of violent scenes in foreign Parliaments. Ho':is 'a very shallow r, thinker, however, iwho would say that - an .Assembly of > cultured men: in which! 1- tumult and physical conflicts take place is "lower" than the' House in--which'mem--bers may shout inane interjections and vulgar.personalities without provoking a. " breach of tho peace, or even a'retort or a ""•■ protest. The stormy scenes that have been . witnessed in the Reichsrath, the' French Chamber of Deputies, and ..even in; the' House of Commons have been directly duo - to political zeal on great issues; the sig- ; nificance in'them has been'the significance ,;- of-a. division.; But bad manners are;ex--30 tremely rare in nny of these Assemblies; 30 and breaches? of Parliamentary etiquette G. Jare treated very seriously by the leading jo men. > ;THo \. blame that- rests upon tliu x ;PRI3JE'/M|NisfEn;for the dotcrioration of obvious! enough,. Thfl':S|«afer 'iß;.oqually blameworthy, .He,

indeed, should take tho initiative in enforcing right conduct. But Me. Massey, as Leader of the Opposition, is almost ,W a worthy of blame as the PniiiE Minister. 1' No one can object to an occasional inter; £ jection bearing on the matter under dis- e cussion, and free and vigorous speech is *! desirable and necessary; but.all parties \ should, cbmbine to insist on a discontinu-: ' .:ancc of tlicbad habits v;hich- arc growing n .up.iiri ■connection .with debates' , in the; J .House .of It is" , riot ; a.' t ■party:..matter;at .all, but the dignity of ■]■, . Parliairierit; arid, the proper conducfof the "r ■business; , of ..the House are at;.stake.. * .Slovcnliness.arid slackness,inParliamcn-, .> I'.tary progressive evils;:'and; ■ \ ■the.time has , arrived when, if tne.Parlia- o Ajjent'fpf this.-country ia to'command tho Respect' , which it should, a blow should .be ' \ struck , 'in, the,House for. the decencies; , of .. iParHament;. ":. ' ;. ; . ■'':,;.'.,; ■. :./■: : .v, j -.■.' :i:?.%- ':■: ::■■ ■ . ■ -■,:■'■''. ■•-'■ ■'.<- i

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091109.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 659, 9 November 1909, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
937

The Dominion. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1909. PARLIAMENTARY MANNERS. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 659, 9 November 1909, Page 4

The Dominion. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1909. PARLIAMENTARY MANNERS. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 659, 9 November 1909, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert