Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SYSTEMS OF PETITIONING.

■:'s:K:^<■''{: iSJIT'FUTILE? ;; •.;■■'. ..'.'.The'systemi of presenting petitions in connection, with ;public- works, wus again debated .in" tho'House yesterday-afternoon.- ■ The Priinr;, Minister averred that the fact : that .a committejs favourably recommended a work'did not have the slightest weight. It .was a mistaken, idea for people to believe that a favourable report gave the request in question a prior claim. : As a matter of fact every application was considered on its merits. A committee; could not have information outside the i :member. ;for the. district to warrant a claim. which : it. recommended to have a su-pc-rior. position, among the applications. It would be incomparably better if petitioners wore told I to send their petitions to tho Minister .for.-Public Works.: '■...- .■;'.-■'. -'.; Referring to the-.matter, later, Mr.' Massey said that the present system of granting votes ■ was tho worst part, of the existing system'of Governmental administration. If, as had been, suggested, it would take a committee six months to go into .petitions properly, - it was impossible for, the Executive to give them proper consideration in a few weeksi Members of Parliament should have some control over public expenditure instead of the requests being- handed over to the heads of the Departments. A more business-like and more satisfactory system was urgently needed. Mr. Baume complained that the Government did not always give sufficient weight to the recommendations of committees on petitions. " It would be far bettor," he remarked, "to face the position boldly and say that no petition should be- accepted by the House, or on tho receipt of a potition it should bo referred to the.Public Works Department." ■Mr. Boss condemned the present system, which, he said, was only a back-stairs system. -■ ' .; ■"- ' . . -.. Mr.,Massey: Petitioning cannot come under the heading "back-stairs.". . , Mr. Boss deprecated the practice of chambers of commerce, etc., making recommendations with reference to public works. . : "I believe I am tho, most bashful member in the House in regard to votes for public works," remarked Mr. -Hogg, who proceeded t) advise members to place their trust in the Public Works Department ' .-., .

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091105.2.21.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 656, 5 November 1909, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
339

SYSTEMS OF PETITIONING. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 656, 5 November 1909, Page 5

SYSTEMS OF PETITIONING. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 656, 5 November 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert