CIVIL BUSINESS.

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 654, 3 November 1909, Page 11

CIVIL BUSINESS.

' ' V (Before Dr. A. M'Arthur, S.M.) Judgment for the plaintiff by default wcj entered in tho following cases -Margaret Rpto v.; Jolih' S3, costs '10s. j Frederick J.'Mann v. James M'Gill, £10 Is. lid., costs 30s\>()d.i Hughe* and Cossar v. Alfred Charles Stsnriard, 17s 10il, costs 20?. 6u.; Smith and. Smith, Ltd \. James Walsh, £h ss. Bd, eosts 234. Cd.; Char Us Pratt > and Co. vi Herbert Francis, £95, coats SA 17s, (id.; H Oscar Hewott'and Cβ., Ltd, t Tame Hona, £7 17s 6d., costs } £1 16s. Ed ; Laery and Co., Xtd. v. James., Woods, £7 pa., -cpSta 18s. Gd.j Jenkins end Mack v. Johij* Bailoy, B*. &i]' costs 5s j Scott-aud Martindalc t. J. _A. Leahy, £7, costs 2Sa:''ed.j William Hendry v, Edward Scagar, JSS'.lDsi costs, 265 Cd.; Stewart Timber Co., I.ta: t. James Smyth, JCS2 os. 3d, costs 305., Southl'Wcllinsten Land Co, Ltd. \. Peter Tulloch, £2 17s. 3d.', judgment for 6osts only, 10s , George Doughty and Co." v. Henry Batten, £$ 159.. aUd costs 235. (jd., Marianne M. P Smith v Kobert Itaih, .41 ss, costs .")■§.; and Trances Jane Hare'/r. Ernest Dally, XI 10s, costs ss. . '''': ' In.' the'eas* Ernest W. Lutz v. John Jacobeen,ff. olaim for>.£s 2s.jßd. r debtor was ordered tojpar tho,amount on or before November IG, ini(l«auU.soy*n days' imprisonmenl. Nelstia Dyson was ordered Iα p?y Thomas A.i,Wells 4-d-ebt of .£25 13s 6d 0n.,0r before November' Id, in default to undergo H days' , u * Thomas, Harvey'was'ordeied to pay Martin Ryan.ru debt 10s. in instalments of 7s. 60. "per^wcek In the ease' Scoular and Co, Ltd , v. Tarauo trtiku rJiiaruinaru, a debt of .£G6 14s. 10d , d«fen3ant -was—ordered to. pay the amount forthWttb., 1 * in default one month's imprisonment, warrant to.be suspended if £33 Is. 5d ,wer« igaid ,oa November SO, and the balance on* December 30> Duncan. Campbell uas ordered to pay the Make tan a Dairy Company a debt of -£G 5s lid. on 'or before November 16, in default men .days' imprisonment. No orders w(+> mado m , th'e , following cases — Q.,Bebora v,<H debt 0fi.85 Os. 6d., And samo ( vt J.'Coouibe; a debt of £3 3s. 3d. i' \.' INBENTED GOODS. , Ephraittf fflggins and Tobias Child Froggatt, 6t Birmingham, malinfacturers (Mr. Dix), prooeeded against W. T. Shaw, storekeeper, Hasterton, to recover jCSfI 2s 'alleged damages sustained by reason of tho defendant refusing to pay (or goods ind-anisd by defendon' Apnl 10 through Messrs. P R. Rue eell ard Company. After beins partially heard thdease was ndjourn<;d until November 11. •J ' n TAILOR AND CLIENT In a ease in which Hallenstem Bros, claimed from Frederick Kilminster a balance of 9s. 6di, alleged to bo duo mi a coat, judgment was entered for the defendant, The amount repretented the difference bstirten the prico oripnally agreed upon for a coat which proved to be a misfit and the alleged \alue of tho coat with which the first bno was rep Faced Mr. Buddle ■was for plaintiffs, and Mr. P. \V. Jackson for defendant. t >{ (Before Mr. W.'g. Riddell, S.M) WHEN THE EVIDENCE DIVERGES. 1 Bartolo Russo (Mr. D. Jaokson) proceeded egainst s Henry Brown (Mr. Tnnghani) to recover £7 17s. for and feeding of cattle, and £1 10s."tor freigh f and expenses in cqhnSction with tho conveyance of goods in the scow Rona to Rona Bay. His; Worship remarked that the evidenco ■was of a, very divergent nature, and it was impossible to npply Ihe striot law to such a set of circumstanora. Ho would uso tho Equity and Good Conscience Clause and give judgment lor plaintiff for £6 Os. on tho hrst claim, and £1 on the second, With costs M Is